IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 04 December 2013 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803B01ADFD6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:16:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u2hxuN3lT9_M for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:16:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D7C1ADFD0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:16:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719AA2CC48; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:16:05 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Mc3h3xsQZxt; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:16:05 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0D72CC6B; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:16:04 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Alternative decision process in RTCWeb
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwjLTC_BEo4nqUi0ZyDWhrWyVqnh+wZ8xxzsuW_rv=E2kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:16:04 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A988CA2E-FE8B-469C-9C55-ECF9CDF4B436@piuha.net>
References: <DUB127-W23531D0E8B15570331DB51E0EE0@phx.gbl> <52974AA8.6080702@cisco.com> <1F79045E-8CD0-4C5D-9090-3E82853E62E9@nominum.com> <52976F56.4020706@dcrocker.net> <3CD78695-47AD-4CDF-B486-3949FFDC107B@nominum.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0EF1B8@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <D45703FF-109A-4FFF-92E9-1CC7767C52F7@nominum.com> <CAP+FsNc=cGhOJNTwXY1z-5ZjisOOvX=EOYEf3htGXGcWRKBf6g@mail.gmail.com> <529CF5F1.9000106@dcrocker.net> <CAMm+LwjCvzDgWTi9mqgvWCoCyRhB+4c8QoaaPQtk=xkBcXMtZA@mail.gmail.com> <98962934-340C-400C-AB30-573C52D13F61@nominum.com> <74FD1382-D5B0-4C70-9AD5-D92150D784AD@standardstrack.com> <CAGhGL2AK2QhNEoahSrFepzcsY9DHsW4Hbk-Kkv1-+gftOCSFSw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwjLTC_BEo4nqUi0ZyDWhrWyVqnh+wZ8xxzsuW_rv=E2kQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:16:10 -0000

> I find the defeatism quite depressing. If we know the reason the previous efforts have failed, all we need to do is to address them and try again. 

FWIW, I agree with this. We should not believe we can make all projects succeed. Or that without a deep understanding of a field we can succeed. Or that we can succeed without understanding and getting the support of the world around us. But the Internet is evolving, the users have real needs and when we know what to do we should do it - you can succeed even in difficult situations.

And now back to your regularly scheduled RTCWeb discussion… (and I'm not claiming that I at least know what to do in the RTCWeb case.)

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email