IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: So, where to repeat?

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Thu, 09 August 2012 01:13 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C229111E8087 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 18:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.818
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.680, BAYES_00=-2.599, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE=1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12=2.46, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zaNnxcIjfp13 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 18:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B0711E811A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 18:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yhq56 with SMTP id 56so1599593yhq.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=at7azovtFakUgo2jaGmRfjmZR0W4xrx+QYnrVBoNlRw=; b=SAeo79h/2nKDtG/MflQYZY3Bv5nB0aYEkOXLR62yETl2Sl0wPbAHBQ/sUgKi6jzxSC /kbNFKIjSj2dQr1lGSoqPJxbvEWA+csB+3jlarX1knKkKWm5i3jdb16aE001hRSoPHAK E9fv0q/SmpFqnqH4peW2yFwbvqQy4xD28qMPYcDmyugD/cB/HtG7tA1MREZz6bsTEW7r VWNTI96Fbf5Ar453+aKVFw/3csnwpjQFj0/R4+4dSFS/Say+GR9Qvn4pkS6yzkvtzQc5 s36JPMbaPNNQ/s8tO12gV75IK+186sGYSfLeTRLFLY7m3tP22kqr9ih5SnZfl7OtUgJe mn4Q==
Received: by 10.50.209.41 with SMTP id mj9mr705796igc.23.1344474827270; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.102] (ppp-115-87-121-149.revip4.asianet.co.th. [115.87.121.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ai6sm7736169igc.0.2012.08.08.18.13.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat?
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5022AD8C.4020205@stpeter.im>
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF280CE839F@PACDCEXMB06.cable.comcast.com> <501EC24B.4080709@bbiw.net> <20120806120547.GA20379@crankycanuck.ca> <B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA234677B967@ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9B1@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <E4873516F3FC7547BCFE792C7D94039C02314C5E@DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9E4@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <CAHBDyN5NLoJWMXEa8EdEVWxtUxm5XsuCjmqD4xn_N=2=7vKGXg@mail.gmail.com> <29F2EDD3-71B8-4762-8753-5C7AF369001B@tzi.org> <15DAC57C-82D5-4261-B0FA-4B700138DA2A@proto6.com> <79811B0A-FA21-456A-8016-BF20DF3FBD95@checkpoint.com> <5022AD8C.4020205@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="=-LFN8R9oxk2mahbxCDwoq"
Organization: Network Zen
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:13:42 +0700
Message-ID: <1344474822.5897.20.camel@gwz-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:13:48 -0000

On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 12:18 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> On 8/8/12 12:06 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
> > Mileage varies. 
> > 
> > For me it was the shortest and cheapest flight of any IETF meeting I have attended.
> 
> If we discussed protocols the way we discuss venue sites, all would be
> lost. "Oh, this feature works great for me, therefore let's include it
> in the spec."
> 
> Perhaps we might consider ending these interminable venue discussions
> and just complain three times a year when we visit a place that the IAOC
> has selected?


I though we already did that ;-).  

> 
> Peter
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email