Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 19 January 2017 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03C712949D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 07:10:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T563Kga7YYkY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 07:10:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7EED12944F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 07:10:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAD2300445 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 10:00:00 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id so3sZh7xwvxv for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:59:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.85.3.71] (wsip-98-172-24-238.dc.dc.cox.net [98.172.24.238]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC1E6300209; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:59:58 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-bradner-rfc3979bis-10.txt> (Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology) to Best Current Practice
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <875519DD-685D-4642-A1D4-0F5D82502E21@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 10:09:56 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <27F46F35-2E43-4BB8-A246-3516DA90A89D@vigilsec.com>
References: <148474911031.2261.11881119527780959351.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <875519DD-685D-4642-A1D4-0F5D82502E21@piuha.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/b46rRDafYuzZxcZGm-x8o-NZTek>
Cc: draft-bradner-rfc3979bis@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:10:17 -0000

Jari:

> * Russ Housley’s concern re: “IETF sanctioned” was resolved
>  per Brian’s and Harald's suggestions (Brian's mail on March 26).

I do not think that the change here is sufficient based on my reading of the thread that followed my comments.  I think my comment is addressed, but not all of the points that are made in that thread.  In particular, the output of the design team is the contribution, not every alternative that is discarded before being written down or presented.  Also, the reference to BCP 25 seems to scope this the design teams in working groups, not all design teams.

> * Russ Housley’s concern re: changes from the previous RFC
>  section is valid (Russ’s mail on March 25), and we will be acting
>  on that as explained above.

I look forward to seeing this text.  Since it does not exist yet, I think the IETF Last Call should be extended for two weeks beyond the availability of this text.

Russ