IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] New RFCs text formatting

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 29 November 2019 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EF71208A1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:29:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a31UzD5_mojR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:29:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D036012011D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 09:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.116] (p548DC893.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.200.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47PhM70jSTzyNR; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 18:29:07 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: [art] New RFCs text formatting
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <01eefbde-e519-15a2-69e9-30df008d09f2@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 18:29:06 +0100
Cc: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 596741344.8178951-05a56fecc9aae382282c53a264ed7e7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FBABDD27-DBC7-496D-8A29-296ABC1A1EAD@tzi.org>
References: <5A8862BB0F82FECBBF737CC6@JcK-HP5.jck.com> <725e1fd3-5af6-02f1-3a81-763797b8222c@gmx.de> <c558eb17-2395-0727-cb9b-4455a277b29b@network-heretics.com> <01eefbde-e519-15a2-69e9-30df008d09f2@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/b4pt_q3xDTUNhyzZ8j0qL1GPo1I>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 17:29:11 -0000

On Nov 29, 2019, at 18:07, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> In any case, this really sounds like the comeback of a discussion we had
> ~7 years ago (with probably thousands of emails), leading to the
> publication of RFC 6949.

Yes!

We are now starting to gain actual experience with the brave new world instead of just random guessing how that will feel (with a heavy dose of process confabulation at the time).  In software, obtaining end-user experience generally leads to iterations.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email