Re: Oauth blog post

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 29 July 2012 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D82921F8628 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AMF53oHxL50b for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F4FD11E8072 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2012 20:28:15 -0000
Received: from dhcp-172b.meeting.ietf.org (EHLO dhcp-172b.meeting.ietf.org) [130.129.23.43] by mail.gmx.net (mp036) with SMTP; 29 Jul 2012 22:28:15 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19i1pAnitViPl9xM9J38GpPJZhUKfUx14hKaHxpV7 mXnlZiy14uohra
Subject: Re: Oauth blog post
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <1343593068.9245.0.camel@gwz-laptop>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:28:12 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6EC0C8C6-3071-4DFD-8F4C-779A08D94D1E@gmx.net>
References: <501531F7.5040404@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120729073422.06d8fe10@resistor.net> <39B73AD9-4E8F-4E94-A538-69BE5D8C0E18@gmx.net> <1343593068.9245.0.camel@gwz-laptop>
To: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:28:21 -0000

> 
> Do you think that corporate domination of "open" standards development is OK?
> 

The barrier for participation is low since there are no membership fees, etc. Nevertheless, those who participate in standardization efforts have to spend their time. So, typically those who participate for a longer period of time need to have some incentives. These incentives often come from working for a specific company.

We cannot force anyone to participate in any of our working groups. In the OAuth case we have lots of other people participating but they typically ask questions and provide implementation feedback rather than trying to steer the standardization work. 

Ciao
Hannes

PS: Eran was also working for a big corporation, namely Yahoo. I could imagine that Yahoo also had some incentives to pay Eran for his participation in this work.