Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Fri, 13 May 2016 10:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20D412B032; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fPGs-YLabTi3; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4B812B020; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B278D28B003D; Fri, 13 May 2016 06:02:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FB61F8055; Fri, 13 May 2016 06:02:12 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-10.txt> (Securing RPSL Objects with RPKI Signatures) to Proposed Standard
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_18528ACD-0F31-47DD-9401-9979DEC2F47B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BF5F229-FC96-403E-826E-EA0E48E2DDBE@tislabs.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 06:02:11 -0400
Message-Id: <D279AF32-3EB4-4455-BD43-4B0097834AE6@tislabs.com>
References: <20160425184508.30206.46648.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20160428225451.GE123284@main> <57332EDB.9090609@innovationslab.net> <3BF5F229-FC96-403E-826E-EA0E48E2DDBE@tislabs.com>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/b9IincJFzDdqXYKZ6QGCbAhcqjI>
Cc: sidr chairs <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, The IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 10:02:16 -0000

I’ve made an error in reference.  Going back through to correct.

On May 11, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:

> 
> You are suggesting much the same as draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles - defining a new EE cert profile.
> 
> This draft would have to say that it is updating RFC6485(bis).
> 

RFC6485 -> RFC6487.

RFC6485 is about algorithms.  RFC6487 is the document about RPKI certificates.

Sorry for the confusion.

—Sandy