Re: I-D Action: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Tue, 04 December 2012 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA0721F8805 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 18:01:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ONfLb05DyM6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 18:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4C321F8596 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 18:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c13so5719181ieb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:01:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=VxDuyKSRd2jBCdwoWXUnoVGrDVETg0J7lCe35wcAW74=; b=a1VF/NRHHiiSFowFNnZ/3oBzO9ywxFTQ4ZHJaSOJEw8nSKKuJDN7WRdnpJStp20S4u 4SN88WZmRjg9sKZA9Kqh1hwkRJt4C0+d+NIdr5zrrVzzOmozjnils/GU+eRjUGqASUiu k6ynby4u+R90wu5uZYQEe7H+9XRTeCXDGummxlDggmLaXKvi2kx9mYRW5orfMn3K4RV4 4Tt0MbWlc2Cgm45PIWNViNHf++kKXXoB9e2Ymj4hqYRyB812SNjP9AKLc66t2AwumsIp e8kdaPJCDI07WvBozekei3wkWyZdHK2oAo/HQpeKOoAt7hQiy4CZ2E7udrMQmZJ4zJYe IZfw==
Received: by 10.43.83.1 with SMTP id ae1mr9839950icc.24.1354586499019; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:01:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.35.195 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 18:01:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU3LbXZrcDSOx3F0BorS9vLg=nZup+3tDNN2i6taJwD6Ow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20121203164849.14555.53508.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=duU3LbXZrcDSOx3F0BorS9vLg=nZup+3tDNN2i6taJwD6Ow@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 11:01:18 +0900
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2ZnQ2tBCUVq2rTzS4ymP5rgYgELy+eb+Ca=1tzJhcROA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I-D Action: draft-farrell-ft-01.txt
To: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec519696d17758204cffd3f85
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 02:01:40 -0000

Whoops, I meant that the draft and implementation match, sorry about that.

Cheers,
Andy



On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> wrote:

> Stephen,
>
> Your goal is laudatory, but the devil will be in the details. For example,
> you wrote:
>
>    Note also that this experiment just needs an implementation that
>    makes it possible for the WG chairs and responsible AD to verify (to
>    the extent they chose) that the implementation matches the draft.
>
> Will this require WG chairs and/or document shepherds to do a code review
> to verify that the implementation and code match? A better criteria might
> be that there be at least two independent implementations that successfully
> interoperate.  That would also show greater WG interest than just a single
> individual or organization.
>
> Open source code is a plus, but shouldn't be a requirement, as such a
> requirement might discourage some vendors from implementing.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:48 AM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>>
>>
>>         Title           : A Fast-Track way to Proposed Standard with
>> Running Code
>>         Author(s)       : Stephen Farrell
>>         Filename        : draft-farrell-ft-01.txt
>>         Pages           : 9
>>         Date            : 2012-12-03
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This memo proposes an optional fast-track way to get from a working
>>    group document to IESG review that can be used for cases when a
>>    working group chair believes that there is running code that
>>    implements a working group Internet-Draft.  The basic idea is to do
>>    all of working group last call, IETF last call and area director
>>    review during the same two week period, and to impose a higher
>>    barrier for comments that might block progress.  The motivation is to
>>    have the IETF process have a built-in reward for running code,
>>    consistent with the IETF's overall philosophy of running code and
>>    rough consensus.  This version is solely proposed by the author (and
>>    not the IESG) to attempt to ascertain if there is enough interest in
>>    this to warrant trying out the idea as an RFC 3933 process
>>    experiment.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrell-ft
>>
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrell-ft-01
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-farrell-ft-01
>>
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>> Internet-Draft<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announceInternet-Draft>directoriestories:
>> http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>>
>
>