IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy

Samuel Weiler <weiler@watson.org> Mon, 23 July 2012 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <weiler@watson.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1240611E80E7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.217, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rPjJcFTqLEy1; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CBD11E80CC; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6NIdNTG029059; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:39:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from weiler@watson.org)
Received: from localhost (weiler@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q6NIdNqa029056; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:39:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from weiler@watson.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: weiler owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:39:23 -0400
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@watson.org>
To: IETF Administrative Director <iad@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy
In-Reply-To: <20120720130733.14364.19024.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207230205230.12609@fledge.watson.org>
References: <20120720130733.14364.19024.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:39:24 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:39:26 -0000

No objection.  Thank you for asking.

Just as with any project that you don't really want to take on, make 
sure the price is high enough that you're willing to do it should 
someone be foolish enough to pay the asking price.

Also consider adding an automatic fee escalation clause (e.g. permit 
the IAD to raise the fee by up to 5% per year without further IAOC 
action).

-- Sam

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status