Re: IPv6-only IETF web server for publishing an Internet Draft?

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FEF12D87C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2018 02:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bBcmnKx5ixlt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2018 02:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B129412D86F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2018 02:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id w4E9JcEA146695 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2018 11:19:38 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 00A5120318F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2018 11:19:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA122031AA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2018 11:19:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id w4E9JbAQ012778 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2018 11:19:37 +0200
Subject: Re: IPv6-only IETF web server for publishing an Internet Draft?
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <fcee1ad8-255c-5619-1945-bab24c95ca89@gmail.com> <6c352737-991e-c4c2-a104-e7ebfe548009@forfun.net> <4E469EA123CE8A23BCF57C77@PSB>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8f6fc380-85ab-d012-2869-0ea0b821a4c7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:19:37 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E469EA123CE8A23BCF57C77@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bAAxa3XjXUFjw_GvW5RhyaCY3FI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 09:19:41 -0000

John,

Thank you for the reply.

I understand the need of universal reachability, separation of 
experiments, and avoid of appeals.

Allow me to wonder though whether the non-IETF XML format went through 
such experimenting before being enforced at IETF scale.

Alex

Le 04/05/2018 à 13:48, John C Klensin a écrit :
> Personal opinion only...
> 
> A key part of the intent of Internet Drafts is that they be
> generally available to anyone interested on the Internet.  I
> understand the motivations for experiments and demonstrations
> but, if something is posted that is deliberately inaccessible to
> someone who cannot not or will not use IPv6, it invalidates the
> function of the document as a generally-accessible I-D and
> presumably could result in a process problem (or appeal) if
> there were any attempt to move it into an IETF consensus process.
> 
> Please do demonstrations and experiments in another way.
> 
>      john
> 
> 
> --On Friday, May 4, 2018 11:37 +0200 "Marco Davids (Private)"
> <mdavids@forfun.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 04/05/2018 10:16, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Is there an ietf.org web server that could be accessed only
>>> on IPv6?
>>>
>>> I would like to submit an Internet Draft but I want it to be
>>> read only with IPv6 https (not IPv4).
>>
>> Make sure it is *truly* IPv6 only for additional fun. So, the
>> name servers should also only have AAAA records.
>>
>> An example of what I mean can be found here:
>> https://dnslabs.nl/
>>
>> And speaking of IPv6 fun; I still like http://42.be/ quite a
>> lot.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>