Re: Qualifying for NomCom

"HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <tony@att.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A04812D72A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xjEP-csmkwEt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93E8712D5E7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049287.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id u37M3prr029352; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:06:37 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 225xwf1h9n-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 Apr 2016 18:06:36 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u37M6ZFw017379; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:06:35 -0400
Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u37M6Rvx017289 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:06:31 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.149]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 22:06:13 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCG.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.7.206]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAE.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.149]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:06:12 -0400
From: "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Qualifying for NomCom
Thread-Topic: Qualifying for NomCom
Thread-Index: AQHRkPkBaE3TgFgCo0Odl4x3Th89cJ9/E2cAgAABUgCAAAB+AIAABFuAgAAma4CAAAS3AIAAAzOA///JioA=
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 22:06:11 +0000
Message-ID: <5E36120B-6D4E-4C0D-9905-2C698455D395@att.com>
References: <CAL0qLwY0FuDp5=RMFEhUMtkK=XNDxX2dogvVY7+OSy88jrrvOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=SYpo-CiHoc07Ukb04Kb1LGV2=BPPyRLUsaqyLM9Hbwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbhYRqw7fXHzYY0=W-CpmeHeDdaZx3z2Qg0cA2aMrmVwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nqmC7NJyg2M6Na8vUj8T-qObO-1gHFEXZzrobb3oOQhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZHGa5OvSmZ=bTd6AWchsm4r=QaJn2nPqD+YjeWPmH9pA@mail.gmail.com> <24691.1460062367@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <5706CC94.3080804@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYvCpL9wwHL0E33HRbMvcckpad=gV-VYgAomJpCdiSrpg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYvCpL9wwHL0E33HRbMvcckpad=gV-VYgAomJpCdiSrpg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.110.241.40]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5E36120B6D4E4C0D99052C698455D395attcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-04-07_15:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1603180000 definitions=main-1604070312
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bB6vzA0Nub9jTahCMj8pCIBdMnM>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 22:06:39 -0000

Looks pretty good.

There's a fourth possible outcome: we've gathered enough information from the experiment that we know what we want to do and don't need to re-run another experiment in order to revise 7437.

Tony

From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com<mailto:superuser@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 5:21 PM
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com<mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>>
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca<mailto:mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: Qualifying for NomCom

How's this look for starters?

http://blackops.org/~msk/draft-kucherawy-nomcom-procexp.txt

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com<mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 08/04/2016 08:52, Michael Richardson wrote:
...
>     > On the other hand, I realize now that previous thread went on longer
>     > than I remembered, and there was a proposal that we (I, probably)
>     > construct an RFC3933-style process experiment and let that run for a
>     > while. If it works well, we can codify it by adding it to RFC7437bis.
>     > So I'll do that. If anyone wants to volunteer to collaborate on it,
>     > please contact me directly.
>
> Yes, let's do that!
>
> It would awesome if we could say definitely that the new rules
> contribute to more volunteers before we actually use them.

That's not quite how RFC3933 works. You'd *actually* run the experimental
procedure for (say) one cycle, with automatic reversion to RFC7437 unless
RFC7437bis was approved. I think it's a good idea. A one-year experiment
affects ~half the IESG and IAB seats so is highly unlikely to lead to
disaster.

   Brian