IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [79all] IETF Badge

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Thu, 11 November 2010 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5846A3A689E for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:56:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.526, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jK1IisvHBTuJ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:56:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ETMail2.acmepacket.com (unknown [216.41.24.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6752E3A67B2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:56:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by ETMail2.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:56:57 -0500
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:56:57 -0500
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:56:53 -0500
Subject: Re: [79all] IETF Badge
Thread-Topic: [79all] IETF Badge
Thread-Index: AcuBydPEUuGc+XnmQW+GvZc3kbwtOQ==
Message-ID: <B8E060F2-17C1-478D-B0AD-5598588B0D4D@acmepacket.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011090344110.46514@fledge.watson.org> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A0B@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <4CDBCD06.2020108@dcrocker.net> <4CDBFAE7.6030800@ripe.net> <4CDC0A4E.3040604@dcrocker.net> <4CDC141F.6070609@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4CDC141F.6070609@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAUA=
Cc: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>, Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net>, "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:56:29 -0000

On Nov 11, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

>> Security on the terminal room is long-standing.  It has equipment in it.
> 
> To be fair, so might the meeting rooms (audio equipment, projectors,
> etc.). Perhaps in this instance the hotel was concerned about theft of
> such equipment. 

Equipment??  Considering the prices in the lobby bar, they were clearly protecting the coffee and tea!

-hadriel
p.s. I for one am glad they had strict badge checking - we're in the middle of a major city, and I don't want to worry about leaving my bag/laptop by my seat in a meeting room when I go up to the mic. (which in my case is too often)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email