Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review

"Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com> Fri, 15 July 2016 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E79312D78D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 06:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1iLCovPMMWto for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 06:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A7BC12D5EC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 06:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A1025FF559; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:21:55 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N5XQ2lPv9Att; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from golem.sobco.com (golem.sobco.com [136.248.127.162]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEE1F25FF544; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Privacy Policy for Review
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
X-Priority: 4 (Low)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20160714083607.0ce35198@elandnews.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:21:53 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0AA26172-A842-4E6C-B7C4-DFFEA25DE22B@sobco.com>
References: <20160316170239.30920.41218.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160318005648.0e552fc8@resistor.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20160328021617.0e0a0e08@resistor.net> <081801d188e1$3ea75d70$bbf61850$@olddog.co.uk> <56F912B8.9070001@gondrom.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20160714083607.0ce35198@elandnews.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bGDAUGT6LijsFwpQ53acx3WtJkI>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:21:57 -0000

actually working on this right now - hopefully we will have a revised version in the next few days

along with a summary of the comments received & actions taken (or answers to questions)

Scott


> On Jul 14, 2016, at 12:15 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tobias,
> At 04:17 28-03-2016, Tobias Gondrom wrote:
>> Yes. The comment period is ending soon and we will be reviewing the responses to the call for review and getting back to the community at that time.
>> 
>> Thank you all for your feedback and input. Please be assured, we are of course and indeed reading the ietf list and your comments and will be including the input together.
> 
> I read the above reply in March.  The IAOC Chair wrote "please be assured" and yet I have not receive a reply to the questions.
> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy