IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 23 May 2008 13:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE283A6C9B; Fri, 23 May 2008 06:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48B73A6C96 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 May 2008 06:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JdeDZvpVdmWP for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 May 2008 06:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (mx2.nic.fr [192.134.4.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F203A6C83 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 May 2008 06:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id A58361C015E; Fri, 23 May 2008 15:03:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01ED1C015B; Fri, 23 May 2008 15:03:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D86A1DAA2; Fri, 23 May 2008 15:03:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 15:03:05 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>
Subject: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Message-ID: <20080523130305.GA15914@nic.fr>
References: <C45AE963.389F6%mshore@cisco.com> <00FD433C-24C0-4007-B44E-8E073B9BC757@shinkuro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <00FD433C-24C0-4007-B44E-8E073B9BC757@shinkuro.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:20:33AM -0400,
 Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com> wrote 
 a message of 41 lines which said:

> Every so often someone suggests RFCs are not first class documents
> and hence not comparable to, say, "real" standards documents.

That's interesting because not all other SDO do it. ISO, mother of the
ISSN standard, does not use it in this way... ISO standards are
referenced by an ISO-specific syntax (such as "ISO 3297:2007", which
does not seem very different from the syntax "RFC 5141").



_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email