Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06.txt> (Recommendations on the Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers) to Informational RFC

"R. Atkinson" <rja.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 22 November 2018 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rja.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBEB130F00; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 06:21:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GPHLt5TSBKIC; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 06:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x843.google.com (mail-qt1-x843.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::843]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BDB8130EE3; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 06:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x843.google.com with SMTP id n21so7572022qtl.6; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 06:21:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=6plAmPFSEoAmWK213tZPZMyDnffzPipQo772jM0r0Yo=; b=AqvBI6E8zrSLv+9FEO6ZfOwZG2HAgOpF0vyDArkpT/tMjrISFAnJ8zpiMEfbh/irvE i/CTiRT8HWtmARirFOyqYnU/cMLY++01p11XPGdo06+Qku6igmWdAHdbrxIlch76uD4O NOrjIAYDzKdwxaTsukeMGT7Ma2EEkCQ1L4wGE7t5xc4jQ/imKPbUjl5ZHgozjW/urqiE KXLcgvOwBj4B+b8CGsUOkOMLY98QBsaCKgH73JlaDdfNuZp7v2Jy/z5ASV/uyrV09eEt BxuknjX2Wu1GJhfu6PAp7nah6eD0oePD7TIIkhd7d5HFeXrbcn6dVtwR1q5TtWqiNEAh Em4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=6plAmPFSEoAmWK213tZPZMyDnffzPipQo772jM0r0Yo=; b=ZnO0BWd7U/qD2/ai4fhfIsT7hEpk6EW0KAtfQcWGDjhegxj1sBXouL5cOMJ9PjjAtT GcEID8jrD6zsoBBR4cZEAM9wvWHgzx7MyNed2KJRQl/ROnkz8f8DEharfI7Q2vWLD5NZ 9p/9aIPK99I3tqS5fkI3welp+sqsyRZxyutQ7nqVPNzposCGAA/vQs5s/c89NK3crQgP 5kWBUKGg3K4zhaLhJkDE/80Jqe0khQzMcFKRhlWd5mTSt8Y24itwA94HzPxizv3dxcXZ um/65fFvfOQ75bVYcBt4RS+qt+BEfY/IbNXp0XxJeuCJkLIeBF323jYGkmU/svuFU+fh 7NvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJBa88kFyfVt0IaLPRsAyXhkXKtyMHVyWl2Wo4eJUSEKYxCMXT5 VqN7KWdHWsH7Ihr18vpAdFpxFgtK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XfuXPxSoJJlBsKm7pWClWBm5xKJDBo5VGuhg2m/wLK5BfyfitRM0urH0K0MM/RCz9KzOXZeg==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6bc5:: with SMTP id b5mr10083201qtt.182.1542896465165; Thu, 22 Nov 2018 06:21:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.30.20.5] (pool-72-83-171-117.washdc.east.verizon.net. [72.83.171.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e17sm27970834qte.12.2018.11.22.06.21.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Nov 2018 06:21:04 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06.txt> (Recommendations on the Filtering of IPv6 Packets Containing IPv6 Extension Headers) to Informational RFC
From: "R. Atkinson" <rja.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bc011e16-b68c-fa78-e8c3-2defa239650f@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 09:21:03 -0500
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, opsec@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7EA653CF-0DE8-4BCB-89F2-66C467FEB9C9@gmail.com>
References: <154264505944.5231.6349536976903745769.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EB81EE5-C8C7-4B6A-9EF4-90B5049E5F88@gmail.com> <bc011e16-b68c-fa78-e8c3-2defa239650f@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bO9LE3vkKBTXrmrzwISAM6kazmI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:21:10 -0000


> On Nov 21, 2018, at 15:51, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> 
> It may have been my failure. If that was the case, please accept my
> apologies.

We are all busy and I understand that things do sometimes fall through
cracks.  So long as we can apply the agreed edits now, I’m quite happy.

> SECTION "3.4.1.5.  Advice"
>> 
>> EXISTING:
>> 
>> For legacy nodes, the recommended configuration for the processing of
>> these packets depends on the features and capabilities of the underlying platform.
>> 
>> PROPOSED NEW:
>> 
>> For legacy nodes, the recommended configuration for the processing of
>> these packets depends on the features and capabilities of the underlying platform,
>> the configuration of the platform, and also the deployment environment
>> of the platform.
>> 
>> REASONS:
>> 
>> Which configuration for processing of HBH options is reasonable depends
>> not only on the features/capabilities, but also how the system has actually
>> been configured (e.g. it might have enabled some feature that BREAKS
>> proper operation if all packets with HBH headers are dropped) and also
>> what kind of deployment environment it is in.   RSVP remains fairly
>> widely deployed and used today, although obviously it is not deployed
>> or used everywhere; RSVP would break.  Similarly, in an MLS deployment
>> environment, transmitting packets containing the CALIPSO HBH is
>> critical (more later on this).
> 
> Makes sense. Maybe we could add your paragraph on "REASONS" as a
> parenthetical (indented) note?

I’m flexible about editing text.  I supplied candidate text primarily to be
clear about what edits I hope to see.  Feel free to add it as a note or
simply to edit the key points into the candidate text to create suitable
new text.

> Also makes sense. Unless somebody screams agains, I will apply the
> suggested edit.

Thank you very much - and a Happy Thanksgiving [1] to all.

Yours,

Ran

[1] A quaint North American holiday, celebrated today in the US and 
     celebrated last month in Canada.