IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Sat, 14 March 2020 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36283A10F2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xHN7pPsstabG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 629573A097D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id z12so3310501wmf.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=TEgpw3T4x6ga/Fi0lsDGhyTXak1AUafqpzJz+XQs4Xk=; b=p1RSl5JUvQm/ZvKmBblBxgyUvpPs8eZ9tIYvhYnw+GgyOn2oFtWMiYBU2k61zSNd5h jDv09myU84c3ZQxyHtpz1oQ2gcq/t07cFVB0a5R5MEZ/BxLTbgoWEFG7DTN2UWDQ6wkM KA477dbcu3HQZppzXc1q4ls/FMpvHUlIERydZja0xdNuQua1m+7PQSt+0sdkX8vTV36T R4DxsvXHp5SNfPo9zqX/yYfNTGpXRnxNu5o62MQF6p7urJg9g6juTCmsDzoZPbuTNuVo QE874w1Ms52Ttc+9qhBOemB0b/hqOO1tAe7wVFjaTGz6Np11cq5fE9cVBhAgqm7ZeHRe iLZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=TEgpw3T4x6ga/Fi0lsDGhyTXak1AUafqpzJz+XQs4Xk=; b=Wv93yuRk8nQoBjpVBgHu3mEXh4zMxSOIprGd7vUyJy7iAeFhDcyEmlFzkdZgcd9a2j tnJ6scEQI7yGRljNLJosCdQrsfv+x51EjKFmaeH/BPiL53myCWW5pVpp4A3fm/JbZOO2 5mcd/ISqDa8ZTXAhT24/oNGISVoAVWdVsvq9Tvrfuq80lgvraHyi+fu0hnXvwXDxzvq+ 6bsVAbwIk65UO5noxHEJeUCwibVusNzj1Lli+cnMJUCuyrjXpiP507LINgiBpgEB4UFL 094VY5NZHJg8iZwrch22GjNku8RF77D1Y3Qw02QnQJwD1+8SHJpFfGDRelbArOlXFr3u qoVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3dsoLunPUeG7H0ithISMX/Yojsuh55KhQPeGzpRa6lTKSumZaZ yco7Di44ebb44EUYYNxi5hU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvZsQ8XpPEWlOzqieZPOw828AQFB8zJSgvME5e0hM/PrO0wnI4mqS0mvFjyKwk/alOH3fvjUw==
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c4c3:: with SMTP id g3mr14796823wmk.131.1584169657702; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:23a8:4140:0:a0d1:4da8:f2a9:a3ae? ([2a00:23a8:4140:0:a0d1:4da8:f2a9:a3ae]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t187sm20848026wmt.25.2020.03.14.00.07.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Mar 2020 00:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2lfo4b0g0.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 07:07:25 +0000
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <9F1556B9-D94B-4977-B387-FB49E7F50415@gmail.com>
References: <m2lfo4b0g0.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17D50)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bSi2zS_T0zI6O2wqnBN6fkLqt9c>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 07:07:41 -0000

+1

I do not see us returning to normality until 110.

Stewart

Sent from my iPad

> On 13 Mar 2020, at 18:00, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>>> One choice is to entirely ignore 107 for the purposes of NomCom
>>> eligibility.  
>> That'd be fine, probably as good or better than any other answer.
> 
> and when 108, 109, ... are remote?
> 
> as i just said privately to someone
> 
> i suspect, similar to the A/V technology, we will need to develop
> attendance taking technology.
> 
> randy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email