Re: How survey results informed preliminary IETF 108 planning

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 22 May 2020 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742A23A03FF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 06:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ofJwpmmS68Cv for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 06:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AE3C3A03FE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 06:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD150300B25 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 09:30:21 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id YEofNCCfKSIB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 09:30:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-72-66-113-56.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.113.56]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11B30300A01; Fri, 22 May 2020 09:30:20 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.14\))
Subject: Re: How survey results informed preliminary IETF 108 planning
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <1UW9WDm4Ib.1CNNASkAWXO@pc8xp>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 09:30:21 -0400
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E20CCE60-77E7-46F8-8A61-63AAA40EB43E@vigilsec.com>
References: <7636CAB0-662E-4CC8-8004-68390C157B91@ietf.org> <1UW9WDm4Ib.1CNNASkAWXO@pc8xp>
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.14)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bd7dBQzsjQjb6Wvr-A7InobyAWI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 13:30:28 -0000

Tom:

Check out manycouches@ietf.org

Russ

> On May 22, 2020, at 5:31 AM, tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> Is there any mailiing list on which to raise issues arising from virtual meetings, apart from this one?  I am thinking that this will go way beyond IETF 108 and so will be a long running discussion :-(
> 
> ---
> New Outlook Express and Windows Live Mail replacement - get it here:
> https://www.oeclassic.com/
> 
> The sorts of thing I am wondering about is
> - fees (much asked about in the survey)
> - technology needed to participate (there seems to be a groundswell that there is no good technology, at least not open)
> - I-D cut off, or not
> - POP location (ie cost of connecting)
> - authentication
> and so on
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>
> Reply-To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
> To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
> Sent: 21/05/2020 18:55:22
> Subject: How survey results informed preliminary IETF 108 planning
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> A new blog post is up at https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf108-survey-results-informed-planning/ about how we’ve used survey results thus far to inform IETF 108 meeting planning.
> 
> Alissa Cooper
> IETF Chair
>