RE: I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF may be criminallyprosecutable in nature...
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> Mon, 02 June 2008 18:50 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A4F3A69FA; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EEA3A69FA for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id amorokT5hUaK for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from colibri.verisign.com (colibri.verisign.com [65.205.251.74]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261253A6A27 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MOU1WNEXCN03.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (mailer6.verisign.com [65.205.251.33]) by colibri.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m52IajvQ010319; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:36:45 -0700
Received: from MOU1WNEXMB09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.25.15.197]) by MOU1WNEXCN03.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 2 Jun 2008 11:49:57 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF may be criminallyprosecutable in nature...
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:49:57 -0700
Message-ID: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C316615572FF914@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF may be criminallyprosecutable in nature...
Thread-Index: AcjE1mt5Z9/9gOSEQhaFJKLqvVYSGwACQlnK
References: <000b01c8c4d4$b94273f0$0200a8c0@tsg1>
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
To: TS Glassey <tglassey@certichron.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2008 18:49:57.0859 (UTC) FILETIME=[7456CB30:01C8C4E1]
Cc: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1258285990=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Todd, This is nonsense, stop it. Of course IETF communications could give rise to the posibility of criminal prosecutions in certain circumstances. The IESG could in theory plot a murder. That does not mean that every legal concotion you imagine is backed by criminal sanctions. On the contrary, conspiracy is only a crime if the object of the conspiracy is criminal. Depriving someone of their 'right' to flame in an Internet forum might under certain circumstances give rise to civil liability. But the right of standards bodies to impose reasonable participation criteria is well established in US law. The participation criteria in the IETF are considerably more inclusive than in OASIS, W3C or IEEE. There is a place for this argument - alt.flame ________________________________ From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of TS Glassey Sent: Mon 02/06/2008 1:17 PM To: IETF Discussion Cc: Harald Alvestrand Subject: I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF may be criminallyprosecutable in nature... I brought this up a number of times and Harald's solution was to ban me from the list. Something that under the US CFAA is prosecutable... His claim was that I failed to show him the money - that special case which establishes that as a standard. OK Harald - the case you want to see is called "The United States v Drew" and was filed in the District Court of the Central District of California (i.e. LA). What it says is that any communications taking place between two parties across a State Line may constitute. I am sending you a copy of that indictment and the CFAA text under separate cover since its 1/2MB. How it plays out is that: 1) An act of Conspiracy under the terms of the Conspiracy Statute in the US is what happens when multiple people agree on something across an electronic transport whether in real-time or time-shifted in nature. The question is whether that is a conspiracy to hurt people or their rights in which case its an issue, or a conspiracy to get together for a dinner party which then would be totally cool one would think. 2) A violation of both civil and criminal statutes of the US Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (per the definition in section (a)(2)(B) of a 'Federal Interest Computer'. Unfortunately this makes all of the covert negotiations for PR and other actions a crime in the US by my reading. Also one which the IETF and its Management including its chair and all AD's and WG Chairs are liable under. I think it also makes key parts of the IETF document/IP submission process possibly criminally prosecutable as well. Jorge - Any thoughts as the IETF's Attorney? As to what to do about this - I suggest that its time for a set of lawyers who are not retained and paid by the IETF to formally review the IETF's processes for conflicts and flaws therein. regards, Todd Glassey CISM CIFI _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- I mentioned once that certain actions of the IETF… TS Glassey
- RE: I mentioned once that certain actions of the … Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: I mentioned once that certain actions of the … TS Glassey
- Re: I mentioned once that certain actions of the … Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: I mentioned once that certain actions of the … Fred Baker
- Re: I mentioned once that certain actions of the … TSG
- Re: I mentioned once that certain actions of the … TSG