Re: [79all] IETF Badge

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 11 November 2010 11:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4C93A69FC; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:54:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.559
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.559 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OGiyAs47L-tW; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:54:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8976E3A69BB; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:54:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-4316.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-4316.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.67.22]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF8A540BB9; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 05:03:53 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4CDBD971.5080303@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:54:25 +0800
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [79all] IETF Badge
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011090344110.46514@fledge.watson.org> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011110103450.3692@pita.cisco.com> <4CDBC1A1.7020500@stpeter.im> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011110330360.9937@pita.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011110330360.9937@pita.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080103040603080702070000"
Cc: iaoc@ietf.org, Samuel Weiler <weiler+ietf@watson.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:54:04 -0000

On 11/11/10 7:38 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> Being required to carry one's badge is indeed a minor issue. Allowing
>> the local host to dictate how we run our meetings is a major issue.
>>
>> Peter
>>
> 
> And having to display your badge = "dictate how we run our meetings" ???

The statement I heard at the plenary was that the local host told us
that we needed to enforce badge checking. I'm not concerned about badge
checking. I'm concerned about the precedent of allowing the local host
to tell us how we run our meetings.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/