Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 10:44 UTC
Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16435127444; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h3tDprjE1uiX; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EC861273E2; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id n11so108386372wma.1; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Hle2NEUjspCa6SAq+Wf3RpZV4sBgRqnRhmyya9oUf4=; b=ut6DwppRkeuwP/WuU+0hhpcqS/Le7LGogcU7+Qld/eDQdIsBD963sPM7mhOBxEInAR 7ZZTr5TNTcLCZUvPQV6AJI1B32uQykl+0F6pyEwLTT9MaXoeWRHoC+I/M0nyBjNVW5+Y ExDW4if7YU1nDOhQEInaaKoS32s4xad98s/uvgcaI4bosic7IWXSk3ORr5xXQSCW47RC zr3wgkcYAbSzXR/66w/zRM6bnTJRrRSyHle7dI6w46CvfG7kXgpmNtYyn//OWeAEd1/j rIZRYTl+bQJMdxtEqp4FKC7T7RjdckOc/dKVOv6aSLzQblZS4NtQz4khHxTRCJDa9iDw 4MXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Hle2NEUjspCa6SAq+Wf3RpZV4sBgRqnRhmyya9oUf4=; b=ZCKx+heEJRDFD3btE4SUKbRq339w8AimprSKURC4J9f/8SO6VzxONdCdn4bmDRXV5m sxatBz41eSdcMDa02Fq+LH16WkebpakZp2JFEO+LQKhScc7nywn972gGZ5KEHs4jVUC2 huw3KyKQ+wuX2Ij4+9MPG37Eif0Q5M4laUk55NQGSNoPOqthteA9ukyACJnnCq1rITk8 /rz8t0TTQmTos0l2f4Kd1E0UcJHSyzMWlGL/R1QXxeIZzeFlf+8RVSkvgbVLzg6m0pj/ k/3aLhS/pJZGVN8BwyhX9y9ELdU7zGiTj10CeP8mjQzM5O5m13BKh5C4Iw3vn+gDS0lM 9hkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1ErMCOv1iDtjDhe3fvAn+UWX4+YuOBavugVdVMK/aSd6Ln5TD/T0/+Gr45tuxpYA==
X-Received: by 10.28.230.83 with SMTP id d80mr8419999wmh.18.1489661076045; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.126] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b199sm3828273wmb.13.2017.03.16.03.44.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 03:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <599257D7-532D-4512-929B-D124623EAF35@ericsson.com> <37ED3E78-B23A-4D29-8597-5A63236129B1@cisco.com> <887bd0f0-32a5-56f1-9ac9-703ecb97a760@gmail.com> <80D8FFF0-2674-48A7-A935-11681F5C5A4D@jisc.ac.uk> <A67E1C07-282B-4422-A2FF-86F6CACBD775@cable.comcast.com> <ab7c95a5-9776-24b5-7c26-4c5987d4c948@isi.edu> <ed2f5144-52fb-dda5-1fb4-62be1625b341@gmail.com> <401F52B1-3D41-4174-9425-50571B2D0B9E@jisc.ac.uk>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "Leddy, John" <John_Leddy@comcast.com>, "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <sprevidi@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis.all@ietf.org>
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6d51de4b-3a9d-0f34-1cd2-5bb30caed75e@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:44:35 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <401F52B1-3D41-4174-9425-50571B2D0B9E@jisc.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bmIPrLVQvs8w8f1gZ2_4taMSpj4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 10:44:39 -0000
> In another form, the answer to John is that there are no protocol police, > so what consenting adults do inside their own networks simply isn't an > issue that an Internet-wide spec can or should address. That is not quite true, the inability to gain an IANA allocated codepoint can make long term private deployments very difficult, either for the protocol squatting on a codepoint because they could not get one allocated, or to the deployment of a new protocol legitimately allocated a conflicting codepoint. - Stewart
- IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man-rfc… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Tim Chown
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Leddy, John
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… 神明達哉
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Voyer, Daniel
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Joe Touch
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Joe Touch
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Joe Touch
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Mark Smith
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Tim Chown
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Xing Li
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… otroan
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Stewart Bryant
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Leddy, John
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Leddy, John
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Tim Chown
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Mark Townsley
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Mark Townsley
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Leddy, John
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- RE: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Ackermann, Michael
- RE: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… 神明達哉
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Tim Chown
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Tim Chown
- RE: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Mark Smith
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… otroan
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… otroan
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Tim Chown
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Jen Linkova
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Martin Rex
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Fernando Gont
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Robert Raszuk
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Last Call conclusion for draft-ietf-6man… Suresh Krishnan