Re: [lisp] OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-11

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Thu, 12 February 2015 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F3A1A87D4; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:16:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9qF7sSCr8ZRD; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:16:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA7581A8739; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:16:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id fa1so11460734pad.2; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:16:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=TAq84aHQETX8StM7z3yWNdgiR+g5LUOHIPxCWXlbRrE=; b=XpLF0WzyhtMHKPJw79g11hYUVe2fDuZDZHPK8y1INNN5RGi7Yh4qzAFDxTC3EB/CfF IszLElfQA3O6oReLPa1KawAxh9cRTUv5t8c6glyPT5NEqFJ5785qyV9X30j2k6Iu/abr jUI+imRJJcEovqAnBmy/EEtdeaEQVM/E+Izy+FcoG6fCD5FIqhMK9Thvp0SzC+CcC5dP U81gKtP4tVkSn81UVs0VM1I7AdvluwggGPGpiDyl1VgylMzzWg8wTra/Wdofzk6SVhyf w8meg0/TF7tnxF7Cj7hukeTCBInfJkyLZwRYGp0HXpxN1zYYiBmC5pN7rZelFlK9QdBL ITkQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.231.102 with SMTP id tf6mr6561544pbc.40.1423746989142; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:16:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.231.66.55] ([166.170.38.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sg4sm3880250pac.11.2015.02.12.05.16.28 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:16:28 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [lisp] OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-11
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B466)
In-Reply-To: <1A8253CB-7E12-4949-BBAB-45BD6DF2F496@gigix.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:16:26 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7424A9E9-AB40-4267-B955-6A1AF2786ADB@gmail.com>
References: <hmrnc76l2jt0ubjwmjvb3c9s.1423706346606@email.android.com> <1A8253CB-7E12-4949-BBAB-45BD6DF2F496@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bq-e0gjfacDyM4HtjFlB3LE5gO8>
Cc: "Jmh.direct" <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "lisp@ietf.org" <lisp@ietf.org>, "david.black@emc.com" <david.black@emc.com>, "acabello@ac.upc.edu" <acabello@ac.upc.edu>, Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:16:31 -0000

> NEW
> 
> "In the mobility case the EID-prefix can be as small as a full /32 or /128 (IPv4 or IPv6 respectively) depending on the mobility use-case (e.g., subnet mobility vs single VM/Mobile node mobility)"
> 
> Opinions?

I agree it is better and handles different cases without explicitly stating it here.

Dino