RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Tue, 01 March 2016 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F31A1B2D31; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:26:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.306
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yxlIVaxGS90G; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:26:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com (mailuogwhop.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAADB1B2D30; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:26:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.34]) by mailuogwprd01.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u21FQdBk029786 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:26:43 -0500
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd01.lss.emc.com u21FQdBk029786
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1456846003; bh=XuojLGN8vqIhjzi5mSuyfpjYLUc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=p+04AqyS0g5rdOTPvljDekDjjXvyH3RifXe4PzlDN3ergXKq9vWa2CFc1uT1jFBhZ qH4MLr1COMJDH30ajfFGiasrQKUC5Hmr1Li5nC5UW8e3pyDertVQaMjHvWTgtxXh6r AtT4wOukgFOtb0FmH8ZTPGQMj4J/LafXP8eh45xY=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd01.lss.emc.com u21FQdBk029786
Received: from mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.25]) by maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:25:50 -0500
Received: from MXHUB107.corp.emc.com (MXHUB107.corp.emc.com [10.253.50.23]) by mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u21FQTI8007227 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:26:29 -0500
Received: from MX104CL02.corp.emc.com ([169.254.8.213]) by MXHUB107.corp.emc.com ([10.253.50.23]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:26:29 -0500
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11
Thread-Index: AdFioHJokdGvI+naQHqEESBvEd8fRQRLRPgQ
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:26:28 +0000
Message-ID: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493623E85A06@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
References: <00b001d162a0$800314b0$80093e10$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <00b001d162a0$800314b0$80093e10$@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.238.45.67]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493623E85A06MX104CL02corpem_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bs4yCe8OvciRsxi6livzabV6U1g>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:26:49 -0000

Hi Roni,
Looks like this was missed - sorry for the absence of a response.
WRT section 6.3.2 (now section 5.3.2) "persistently fails to deliver acceptable TDM service" is discussed in significant detail in Appendix A of the referenced [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] - it turns out to be a much longer discussion by comparison to section 6.3.1 (now section 5.3.1) that involves references to ITU-T G.826 and G.875.  I'd prefer not to reproduce or try to summarize that discussion in the tsvwg-circuit-breaker draft, but a sentence could be added to the end of that section to point the reader in the right direction, e.g.: "See Appendix A of [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] for further discussion."
Thanks, --David

From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 1:43 PM
To: draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2016-2-8

IETF LC End Date: 2016-2-9

IESG Telechat date:



Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a BCP RFC.







Major issues:





Minor issues:

In section 6.3.2 the proposal is "For that reason, the draft suggests that a managed circuit breaker that shuts down a PW when it persistently fails to deliver acceptable TDM service is a useful means for addressing these congestion concerns." I accepted to see some definition of "persistently fails" at least similar to section 6.3.1.




Nits/editorial comments: