Re: The anti-harassment policy has gone missing on the Web site.

Alexa Morris <amorris@amsl.com> Fri, 26 April 2019 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <amorris@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E901205E6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AODl6PlZGpQb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AFB812051D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD2D1C38D8; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mkSz6gJRzgJp; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:647:4200:85ab:b9c8:5863:41f2:584c] (unknown [IPv6:2601:647:4200:85ab:b9c8:5863:41f2:584c]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84DAF1C38D7; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Alexa Morris <amorris@amsl.com>
Message-Id: <2C885DCB-49BD-4A9B-B14A-4884A9EF04A4@amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6503812E-D9D0-484B-8D82-B82DB69A9A02"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: The anti-harassment policy has gone missing on the Web site.
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:48:53 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAP8yD=vgaCs8R0MF8OxiUDVAFvuwhmtU_+Vja6ebzzdOgb0vGw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwgd9qoMjpZmYbXPU+S3ixaGhRBM29L-N1kR0m6Ryg37kQ@mail.gmail.com> <9679365A-7D12-418C-A9C3-9FE0C24D9627@vigilsec.com> <CAP8yD=vgaCs8R0MF8OxiUDVAFvuwhmtU_+Vja6ebzzdOgb0vGw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bvpcL7EYbtA_YvfAldi6pHHdN68>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:49:10 -0000

Hi Allison,

Yes, unfortunately at the moment there are a number of links that will 404. This is a recent development that has to do with the integration of the Wagtail CMS with other IETF services and tools. I want to specifically note that the issues do not reflect a problem with Wagtail per se, nor are they the fault of volunteers or staff. However, there are conflicting directives that are causing issues, and a corrective clean-up is required.

In order to avoid extended periods of slowness due to server restarts and testing, this project will proceed at a slower than normal pace; Glen, AMS IT Director, will start on Monday morning and it's anticipated to take 2-3 days.  While there should be no downtime during the clean-up, there are likely to be periods of perceived sluggishness with www and the Datatracker. 

Alexa


> On Apr 25, 2019, at 1:46 PM, Allison Mankin <allison.mankin@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The link to IESG statement  cited in RFC 7776 (the anti harassment procedures BCO) is a 404 now:
> 
>  [Policy <>]   IESG, "IETF Anti-Harassment Policy",
>               <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/ <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/ietf-anti-harassment-policy.html>
>               ietf-anti-harassment-policy.html <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/ietf-anti-harassment-policy.html>>.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 4:39 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> wrote:
> https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf-anti-harassment-policy/ <https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf-anti-harassment-policy/>
> 
> 
>> From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com <mailto:phill@hallambaker.com>>
>> Subject: The anti-harassment policy has gone missing on the Web site.
>> Date: April 25, 2019 at 4:33:34 PM EDT
>> To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>>, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org <mailto:chair@ietf.org>>
>> 
>> I just spent five minutes trying to find the anti-harassment / open participation statement on the new Web site. Like many other things, I can no longer find it.
>> 
>> Point is that this is something participants need to see even if they are not looking for it. 
>