Re: Consultation on *revised* IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 04 June 2020 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82353A1049 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sl6IqtPeXc3r for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E903A1048 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id x27so4638197lfg.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PEKOk0tlRf2Z8ouZvIebKEOblgf+Zt7V5CbEIncmJ8I=; b=nXV0DQSnRK7GmRiJVmolHNbzMK1qqXqSwkYgEF0YW7NINEtoqI/ZznFbkWChmKJ8sR nI1NPkuL/3TuU1VRdWHgQ+hTTWTmLIImlItkeKwYjKuVCB+/CNjz3NDJZDE39JAVXlx3 I0g/+dAvjsUrHp3p2Ug/+XTPZwqSbBSf/tJnPlIJyJyxdfIGYO5X8DqCOZR4vBujuUlL xVRBnEqZBPystpiKmomIiBAu7tFsyvE+LJUUFkTusigNpxPTVL0dS4EJaDvNiC7fxE0s 26KdotaQaaasZwoqfFTX8EvXWtk8V/BjkGaaglU48uZwNR+i38f4reKZoBiyxlVP4Xfc VpFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PEKOk0tlRf2Z8ouZvIebKEOblgf+Zt7V5CbEIncmJ8I=; b=N5Z+hIKMLNdWB9N17yW/Ho9iokqdz0n87ydEaapaMx2Xklaox5XgV9axfxD9lT6aHB pt4JVjk7crgg2aTro+hLA4owZrjo68UZ5eohx7dQypN7NLQoe2i4SyagEu+po2vYdArj YEqwlPrAhZl5v5zDxQwFNnPTZAxcAm/9MgNKyJcB4VBUgReJyPcpUWPySBNzvSOwbYIt iyQHP/BQ/b4lu6gJzXkY//fHiKH3wM/TPj1WZmGCeywPjIWtcJfamAlyKf8D01XSPTb5 miTAgklQKC8RoB5sc2vJeP9mz1TAebc9Pu0AY6U0d9TXciPXHwhz/cngGYDe5OXtT10V QS7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532O2DphPpfx9oYcHGIs4V4KHaOMHsoAf+nfuHCSx8binPh9Jejt 2KNV3B6k3FQCke1G7dC+/ws2Lx0ocfMu2HPLTQsYeF+prsc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyE1YinjGBr4TNtJzLq2DMKCF5S7W9zSOdkQ7VxvNJef/6mz5Yc/6d1W1FefF7R9UyItGdeUzzGoPzMwdFAQ70=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5197:: with SMTP id u23mr3749523lfi.109.1591312965489; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159115348321.13976.12703268950916172390@ietfa.amsl.com> <5435ade6-fdaa-4793-e5cd-438f6a0298d4@cs.tcd.ie> <1FE0EF67-6AC8-424B-8E30-5B85C931B230@ietf.org> <CABcZeBMPPT2hYEKTpXbX0MusOS97Rq3==xMnPKDbO1mhuVA-TA@mail.gmail.com> <89AFA3D3-2B51-40FB-B10C-5302A158B13B@ietf.org> <CABcZeBNzoCXHV31PZzo4-kKaTFAohUf764mgOBfN9Dg6S=rZSg@mail.gmail.com> <60F36ADA-0DCA-40C7-896C-C30323875A11@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <60F36ADA-0DCA-40C7-896C-C30323875A11@ietf.org>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:22:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOJKzhzULHbzW6Pqb8ysHH+wBS-RChB9DbeFoi3J-R3wA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consultation on *revised* IETF LLC Draft Strategic Plan 2020
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000008e9ae05a74a6cfe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/c19aCKTjnfBreUwbYttI0jq8ous>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 23:22:49 -0000

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 4:18 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:

In either case, I think this text should be removed.


Thanks again, I’m going to stick with it though.

Perhaps it's worth taking a step back here and asking what you think the
terms of engagement are on this consultation.

Your text above seems to imply that you are putting this out for comment
but are the ultimate decider on whether to accept those comments, as
opposed to this requiring community consensus. Is that in fact your
position?

-Ekr