Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 31 March 2020 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3DB3A21D1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sSojAlPMSxj9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 609A43A21D2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02VECqg1016757; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:15:20 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=Pb+eH9yexXF686VceCNFX7+YlwKCfqeCwZL7xiBoVtQ=; b=HmQmM5wQQbHlNEt30pPEYX2ctWv4bBLuczaP1TED35OqEbSooOcGov4Mnb2SvUPZWgbZ kypba0NVDIu/Kb7P6sCrYw/qgQS4TS1nSZL7wtWrwBFw+mYArCI6+HfDVDqpsDyvA4ZV fvtPETQcbaxiQjS9Q27c9GwDTdCh+0JUjWUeMOQ4silE3mYgrPh0KKInQ9zHNHYxDWlj ex9bgwaCz45qaTWsK8+1prZqsBVpzsQNWSGZekchMrDhQWPxzrsD7YxZDPd3kAhAsv+t Pig9Z3UOZfNSy9N+jJTSSzhGsCyFxHC4eZ/RaoAVYM56BtUGTE7ODBVtGEvnGy/Szpd4 Ig==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [96.6.114.121] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 301y0965e2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:15:20 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 02VE38ZP025378; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:15:19 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.118]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3028d8k19p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:15:16 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) by ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:15:09 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 09:15:02 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
CC: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Thread-Topic: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Thread-Index: AQHV+T17YIte9GVOtUSJhAMBWIG3LKhaRrUAgAhDeoCAAA0YgIAAVJEA
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:15:01 +0000
Message-ID: <A74E1D2A-2937-46C5-AB50-FBE0C8625AF2@akamai.com>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCzMPGuunYZBCSh90ddY2kKJ_Hqnot0s1jmhNQ7qT0xkg@mail.gmail.com> <89730DD8-0451-4658-A0CD-83A85E2055FE@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <89730DD8-0451-4658-A0CD-83A85E2055FE@episteme.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.118.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D77603ED95E85442BA7D5085A75F5FD9@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-31_04:2020-03-31, 2020-03-31 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=511 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2003310129
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-31_04:2020-03-31, 2020-03-31 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=492 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003310130
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/c1jqNQwJf5Le5phM2aWpCvdCwjM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:16:33 -0000

I strongly agree with what Pete and others have said.

Between this and the RFC-Ed WG decision, it's not a good month for the IETF.