Re: [xml2rfc] [Rfc-markdown] End of support for xml2rfc on Python 2.x is coming soon

Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com> Tue, 08 October 2019 22:19 UTC

Return-Path: <henrik@levkowetz.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52887120046; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fnN0otqq4kT7; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99A4F120020; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 15:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h-202-242.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([158.174.202.242]:52055 helo=tannat.localdomain) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <henrik@levkowetz.com>) id 1iHxot-0003hr-Bl; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 15:19:03 -0700
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <082EE9F1-D4AA-487F-BB8C-08CDB59C5A2F@vigilsec.com> <02046145-9455-4C01-9F6E-246D3940C86E@tzi.org>
Cc: RFC Markdown <rfc-markdown@ietf.org>, xml2rfc@ietf.org, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
From: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Message-ID: <96647ed8-2627-4434-ad51-b373eadfade6@levkowetz.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 00:18:53 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <02046145-9455-4C01-9F6E-246D3940C86E@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5gbFIuRtqBF0tK4k6g3Lfn9BMvl0k6wg3"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 158.174.202.242
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ietf@ietf.org, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org, rfc-markdown@ietf.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org, cabo@tzi.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] [Rfc-markdown] End of support for xml2rfc on Python 2.x is coming soon
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/c3Ux4qQeVEVLRdt8I7Uib0mZNDg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 22:19:05 -0000

Hi Carsten,

On 2019-10-08 23:48, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2019, at 23:23, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> 
>> (2) The default output formatters will change to v3.  The v2 formatters
>>    will still be available by using a --legacy switch.
> 
> Please do this in a way that will not randomly break scripts and
> other programs that need to run xml2rfc. (A calling script/program
> has no idea what version of xml2rfc is installed locally.) [Actually,
> that is also true of people calling xml2rfc…]

Does it work for you if we say 'if you want v2 output, please add --legacy
to your scripts already now'?

The --legacy switch to force v2 output (for compatible input) has been
available for around 6 months, so even if you don't have the bleeding
edge version installed, this should work as a compatibility path, I think?


Best regards,

	Henrik