IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 10 a.m.

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 11 July 2016 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFA412D0AE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hCiWCo3oKe2p for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x229.google.com (mail-lf0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A3D112D08D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x229.google.com with SMTP id b199so1720662lfe.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:44:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TJYJreKuFoc/mdgQ8Zn8kR7aXsXn0ET4RJlLWGHL5sk=; b=zIlxENPzTSiETPtFcGz6/smq5pBkHX/m6SeGE5cx+CyNy+yaTACEhauEFKh6u3Aaqa Ocq/fiIyn4PA3A5OjhwY7N30kwPGeZqau2utVkasio3k3WxyFA2Vq4+YIEq9Heos1X1c fJzk8raCuBvnut2qcjDgTV2q8jsvNyUp2im/OJcQdUfY73HRhLSKOSakyy09KYQQxgwz R1QKZgmXqs0apRKX2vYETOl5pc6qp7EbecXTP+Coxa/Pkqni3aRrmYJiFEiec0Z0C9xu h+Nog6vxkVK+HHUZOpJvCoVshtYRFc6wSB965msg5NflqzoqHZVnH6hOu4k4kS2NYe1k dxmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TJYJreKuFoc/mdgQ8Zn8kR7aXsXn0ET4RJlLWGHL5sk=; b=hq7QQsiKdPp739ueQJznuFeL2kBuGPFuZUQUduNVQa1GB+rKphq9Pw+MJyCsKEeXjn zQsw1AV5EXDZ31bmlQ+Mo0TNhExgjpnbUY745womsc/GYLRhLdGg6R7Ul+zyeXWahoIH KIaNHDbVF661UO75xFU+9Jhwbc0mu8IhgErpQG2dVnvyG5kjBeGYyRASuEX/L6AgNhvE 4jc4TSnwiNYnbzK2kKoKNKT+7TVukScN8QKYxs3yuML5s6aqaLTrCGXgFKZaoDKpqjkO vKAYXhEm9DfunhXTYZ5JoK4yjC6FDjseLMQ69dKV3gU+g6/WLal8QP8SzRwix/6/txSS Aopw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLin22sMJb+uh84Z3jijf7wfcH7mQj0c/AHvIYApuK6pZSFLmBxBEQ3NMcpQKAIKduYc3GG76qFKTRZvg==
X-Received: by 10.25.91.149 with SMTP id p143mr248987lfb.39.1468277055422; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.219 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1b9ef012-5fb4-15ec-6397-172d7ba92410@dcrocker.net>
References: <ffde10f3-3084-3267-04bd-e052d120bc01@gmail.com> <41f9104e-335f-b2a9-3ca8-9d5b0e7de3b6@gmail.com> <57841CE1.60709@tzi.org> <1b9ef012-5fb4-15ec-6397-172d7ba92410@dcrocker.net>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:43:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=V8w45BAWd5dqCFPmXNPfJrDtGMcrQWdVYyELXwWRS0w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 10 a.m.
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114124b452176f053763e421"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cBFJ2BfsDW5v5l4qZjgVKmyz1mI>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:44:20 -0000

It's easier, at least!

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 7/11/2016 11:25 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>
>> Actually, we have won five hours of productive time that can be used by
>> small groups to get work done together before going into the WG meetings.
>>
>
>
> cancel the morning meetings and you can get an added 2.5 hours of
> productivity.  this all suggests a relatively straightforward, logical
> progression for scheduling...
>
> or we could step back and consider the IETF meeting in strategic and
> tactical terms and decide on basic allocations of time and basic purposes
> for them.  /then/ we could decide on such things as start and end times.
>
> but debating an hour here or an evening there, as independent decisions,
> seems to be more fun.
>
>
> d/
>
> --
>
>   Dave Crocker
>   Brandenburg InternetWorking
>   bbiw.net
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email