Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-sbc-funcs-05.txt
Black_David@emc.com Fri, 04 April 2008 14:33 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAED43A6E72; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1093A6C4C; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.311, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SXc-K8P3iWMt; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFB028C40C; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 07:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI03.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.23]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m34E2L7m011804; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:02:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (uraeus.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.14]) by hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (Tablus Interceptor); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:57:47 -0400
Received: from corpussmtp4.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp4.corp.emc.com [10.254.64.54]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m34E27Fh002163; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:02:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Black_David@emc.com
Received: from CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com ([128.221.62.11]) by corpussmtp4.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:02:06 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-sbc-funcs-05.txt
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:02:02 -0400
Message-ID: <8CC6CEAB44F131478D3A7B429ECACD91016F5F02@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipping-sbc-funcs-05.txt
Thread-Index: AciWXHUGeMgU94roTG6JPzmBP74law==
To: Jani.Hautakorpi@ericsson.com, Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com, bpenfield@acmepacket.com, alan.ietf@polyphase.ca, mbhatia@3clogic.com, gen-art@ietf.org, sipping@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2008 14:02:06.0372 (UTC) FILETIME=[775BC640:01C8965C]
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.1.298604, Antispam-Data: 2007.8.30.51425
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=, SPAM=0%, Reason='EMC_BODY_1+ -3, EMC_FROM_0+ -3, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __C230066_P5 0, __CP_NOT_1 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
X-Tablus-Inspected: yes
X-Tablus-Classifications: public
X-Tablus-Action: allow
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 07:33:05 -0700
Cc: Black_David@emc.com, jon.peterson@neustar.biz, mary.barnes@nortel.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-sipping-sbc-funcs-05.txt Reviewer: David L. Black Review Date: 4 April 2008 IESG Telechat date: 10 April 2008 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Comments: The authors have addressed all of the comments from the Gen-ART review of the -04 version of this draft - that was nicely done, and many thanks to the authors. The draft could be published as an RFC in its current form, but there's one nit that really should be dealt with: One of the comments was addressed by adding the last sentence to this paragraph in Section 3.4.2: There is also a problem related to the method how SBCs choose the value for the validity of a registration period. This value should be as high as possible, but it still needs to be low enough to maintain the NAT binding. Typically SBCs do not have any deterministic method for choosing a suitable value. However, SBCs can just use a sub-optimal, relatively small value which usually works. Please provide an example of "a sub-optimal, relatively small value which usually works". This merits careful consideration, as implementers may well use the value provided as an example. One possibility is to use 15 seconds as the example and cite Section 3.5 of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-guidelines-06.txt (as an informative reference) for the source of this value (and a useful place to look for further discussion of this topic). Minor nit: Section 3.1.3: (i.e., information related to network elements is beeing hidden), Extra "e" here ------------------------------------> ^^^^^^ idnits 2.08.05 ran clean. Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf