Re: A mailing list protocol

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 05 December 2012 16:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB05221F8D02 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 08:54:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C3+vyF7oyyCu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 08:54:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1275121F8D00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 08:54:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.139.136]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB5GsCg0001485 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 08:54:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1354726464; bh=fhJW1Qyhnp75r8pVKrQ5Zx+PMePpAUjV+wU8PXUI0cE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=sVqsQ71f8B84aTcqIm6nmHbmTddI5UpuAgU7+ldJAi7QN8hSas5liTQ+a0K4DJgMS M84XNMfLcOJK66Soqs5D+OvuhCOxq5VTayyZRa546V6cLYzDbyhqia6wW4y5jYr7O2 uk2q6oK/fhkM3hlrBvHZtEdiMbubT9sy2Oqempf0=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1354726464; i=@elandsys.com; bh=fhJW1Qyhnp75r8pVKrQ5Zx+PMePpAUjV+wU8PXUI0cE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=AyPCFm0f1SEN72YsM0TvIG31UeaS63bDNEFPkJu7MU77Catfilz8+Ke4OmclTQgU7 6/b4ZST4ipco8GNWKifFWwuID/Mrx92d+mYBcXCfLgzsj4FbjUWILD4tLKeaTss8Ja 0oB4ah9te4QBMo9QJzAQx0mbpTX9DM9IKIIheZvU=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20121205072148.0a0dbd38@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 08:52:59 -0800
To: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: A mailing list protocol
In-Reply-To: <50BF574F.20505@gmail.com>
References: <20121204183432.3748.97064.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121204121234.09360870@resistor.net> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230338CCCD84@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <CABkgnnWG6Gn+StCBdft2Ku7B7pbZ-aS=6x2evESGzAr1EvnDyQ@mail.gmail.com> <6eef05ba-d970-4f6b-9fde-acbd93035544.maildroid@localhost> <50BF574F.20505@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:54:36 -0000

Hi Arturo,
At 06:16 05-12-2012, Arturo Servin wrote:
>         What are "those"?
>
>         Without the context it is impossible to guess, at least for me.

According to 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg76273.html 
the message posted by Scott Brim ( 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg76275.html 
) is a follow-up comment to the message posted by 
Martin Thomson.  The messages posted by these two 
persons are related to the message posted by Wes 
George ( 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg76271.html 
).  That message contains the words "client 
implementations".  The comment from Scott Brim could be rewritten as:

   The issues mentioned by George Wes and Martin Thomson are all endpoint
   implementation problems and thus not subject to IETF standardization.

As the sentence written by Scott Brim has a 
smiley at the end, the idea expressed might be  somewhat similar to:

   Mi perro se comiĆ³ las hojas donde estaban mis deberes del colegio.

The comment is actually a good argument.  Whether 
it would be valid or not is a matter of context.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy