Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls

[Marc Blanchet <[e-mail]>]

Le 2012-12-05 à 04:25, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) a écrit :

> Hi Donald, 
> 
>> It's a question of costs and benefits. The cost of the IETF Announce
>> posting is small. There are not that many of them and I don't find
>> them to be a burden.
> 
> How many conference calls as part of working group activities did you
> organize in the last two years?

I did some.

> 
> Maybe there are not that many because the overhead is too high to
> organize them. 

don't agree. Matter of minutes.

> 
>> The benefit in openness and transparency is
>> large.

I agree with Donald.

Marc.

> 
> Are working group activities not open and transparent in your view?
> 
>> Thus the answer is simple and the policy should remain as it is
>> for now. If conditions change, it can certainly be revisited.
> How many conference calls of working groups you are not subscribed to
> did you attend? 
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Donald
>> =============================
>> Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   [phone] (cell)
>> 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
>> [e-mail]
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Hannes Tschofenig
>> <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>> The concept is simple:  a time-specific gather is a meeting.
>> Meetings
>>>> require prior announcement beyond the working group.
>>> 
>>> I am not against a meeting announcement. I am suggesting to announce
>> the
>>> meeting where the audience is -- in the working group.
>>>