IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WCIT outcome?

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 02 January 2013 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AA721F8831 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:08:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.615
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.615 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DCD0V6ssMNsj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:07:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D0D21F8830 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:07:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r02N7q7r015414; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 15:07:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1357168077; bh=DxhEAjObcLW4Yuy1WXQ5I2GI55+yKRTXl9o+PzROI98=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=djAqHuUVDWbym1rtKKBC7kyuAN5pJxE+rWIWHBpOhPW1ypm2kN+vLkk4xHXoimBqy RaC5hl/LWVImfNzXRPM34PkR8hKzjW906mmIkAnlDl5eN2ujg4dUGUaJVJWmz+8rjI pkY/d1OlJ2/D1y+FaEliae/+BFOwLwLSxs1Esh/Q=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1357168077; i=@resistor.net; bh=DxhEAjObcLW4Yuy1WXQ5I2GI55+yKRTXl9o+PzROI98=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=2U3TDJLztJjsW+HvkmJ6Lq+pC9iqL5JS2by4QSEFrbsvmjhYR5zoTXG3Yyf3BWjY+ 4QBahpYinmDjE8q/R/R9NA/jKjVvcCCczQ10NTYuEW0TdLu0KDQVrBvvMxGwT55/Rz BCULhMW5hpsVzYwN9O9xcSSPJ/mldSeDCli9sHRE=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130102102429.0a460600@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:06:02 -0800
To: John Day <jeanjour@comcast.net>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: WCIT outcome?
In-Reply-To: <a0624082fcd09e07ab9c8@[10.0.1.3]>
References: <CAMm+Lwh2cHRY+Dk2_SDtZZmUbPcgRpP89u3DHUcniJDrKrX_pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMzo+1a0-90dnjnvs48a9DcNN9DY_edF5hH0__4XRuCaLHtL6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwjzjLc2-=4EdxwHOi21B3dOBUohYc5hhXZHL_Pk+iBBmQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20121229192941.0aae33e8@resistor.net> <CAMm+LwiC0xtJU4vnGFPvAG4VKZdj7Tf3LfW0+pzwxKWTegRREw@mail.gmail.com> <a06240800cd074efd45b8@10.0.1.3> <CAMm+Lwiq+DCzXw572wKs78DG+XzYsJtwCVSPvNuVHSrT=Cr2nA@mail.gmail.com> <a06240809cd0799fee029@[10.0.1.3]> <6.2.5.6.2.20130102023406.0b4b7d68@resistor.net> <a0624082fcd09e07ab9c8@[10.0.1.3]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:08:01 -0000

Hi John,
At 05:11 02-01-2013, John Day wrote:
>Could you expand on this?

The question (asked in a previous message) used the word 
"telecommunication".  If one goes by the definition in Y.2001 it may 
not fit everybody's view of what "telecommunication" should 
mean.  The objectives in Y.2001 are broad.  They can be interpreted 
in various ways.  People will argue about what are important 
considerations and which of them should be subject to international 
regulations.  Does security, for example, affect commerce?  Should 
security include lawful interception?  Each question can raise other 
questions.  It's a slippery slope.

Regards,
-sm

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status