IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net> Sat, 14 March 2020 04:21 UTC

Return-Path: <resnick@episteme.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939063A0CDB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3IAobAQ0l6yd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from episteme.net (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E453D3A0CD6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 21:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7351A39CA0E; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:21:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from episteme.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (episteme.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QQtVDr1QewNU; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:21:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [172.16.1.18] (episteme.net [216.169.5.102]) by episteme.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D973A39CA05; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:21:07 -0500 (CDT)
From: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:21:06 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <13BA8883-83B5-4FD6-A5B8-C608224E5150@episteme.net>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+r2OrFVbZj=3fTRUapkDkxap2T-p+QzNfaqK4N0c+haQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200313162255.GB8656@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20200313204317.GR21734@vurt.meerval.net> <CAA=duU0jN0y12_HpzzK73BRD+x19ZQn74V=ju2_wwS-RUL_9Yw@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+r2OrFVbZj=3fTRUapkDkxap2T-p+QzNfaqK4N0c+haQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ccZ4If87_wTlqRQjcfCfUfaGQv4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 04:21:14 -0000

On 13 Mar 2020, at 18:54, Barry Leiba wrote:

> For the longer term, we need to decide if and how to give NomCom 
> eligibility for remote participation, but let’s please not try to do 
> that in THIS discussion.  There will be a GenDispatch session on 23 
> March, and I strongly encourage people to get time on the agenda and 
> make a proposal there for work on that topic.

As one of the GenDispatch chairs: This topic was discussed in the 
GenDispatch session at IETF 106 at which time the rough consensus of the 
room was that it could use some of its own virtual BoF time. Even though 
the GenDispatch agenda is pretty light at the moment, I would prefer not 
to simply re-hash the IETF 106 discussion without some new substantive 
material to be dispatching.

The suggestion to start discussing this on eligibility-discuss@ietf.org 
seems like a good one.

pr
-- 
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email