IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Equably when it comes to privacy

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sun, 08 September 2013 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4528421F9AF8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 10:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hy6feMiWKMLv for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 10:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72C821F9AE3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 10:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r88HsHTn000958; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 10:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1378662863; bh=keDo8zU55SU5T+RHqD1DaO8gdQhmlaScEjSNqRbTxWM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=xbxInsEQ6PlPH3w9Ov/aw6GnwUZ4Pv3TrV7d3EXp0BSqlzJIknGTwp5uO5gXCitLj haZduJI5X3e5LK56IhSPaYA6HhEyl8sKVM2wy/wTW2DKDfnT3OWG3YaPMM2E0R+4TH zymvOSSKx1x3KtchB7dkFP4BkE5GxrtMBEkdFsZU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1378662863; i=@resistor.net; bh=keDo8zU55SU5T+RHqD1DaO8gdQhmlaScEjSNqRbTxWM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=MJ8qcvwY7kIA1o4xCfAUOwFbWYOltm3gcqyb/J0EzQSd1issSwGAfzv4KMbiyeS+z 59jFSPoT5gVzmMIejZwUYl6fbito3sKPdDHv25znw8VKJ5nEMXwEpO7R3Sx0O262J9 mAnnktS6trvNeByA0CrLKcpmxpTHZOzmhLKVanCE=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130908091804.0bbce3e8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:37:34 -0700
To: Jorge Amodio <jmamodio@gmail.com>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Equably when it comes to privacy
In-Reply-To: <CAMzo+1amo--jta=G605M1f3qbfrc7FnnTXvWw7BmCBQxckABUA@mail.g mail.com>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309051743130.47262@hiroshima.bogus.com> <52293197.1060809@gmail.com> <5C7FECAB-8A22-4AF1-B023-456458E1B288@nominum.com> <522949C2.8010206@gmail.com> <52294C6D.7090206@gmail.com> <m2ppsmzgs5.wl%randy@psg.com> <5229686A.5090308@gmail.com> <31078634-5AEA-4FC9-80A8-2E77650BA530@piuha.net> <20130906072539.GJ5700@besserwisser.org> <9AC2A86F-250C-4B3C-B9BA-8DF44C937B41@nominum.com> <20130906210638.GC3428@besserwisser.org> <158C3418-AE87-4843-BFD5-3E2AC3495631@virtualized.org> <CAHBU6itwDc8DiY4B_2GGe0xWZ3Zs_ctx3BkKkzdGTZT2PfgMkA@mail.gmail.com> <D5826CC9-7751-4559-BA3B-AAC38CC9E93C@nominum.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1309061604320.1826@egate.xpasc.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130907184411.0ba68c30@resistor.net> <CAMm+Lwgi=rRRe2J-xUaL6R+aMSQG7F0BTTmJJeK-WwEDuJQujw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMzo+1amo--jta=G605M1f3qbfrc7FnnTXvWw7BmCBQxckABUA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 17:54:34 -0000

At 07:07 08-09-2013, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>You mean like Pakistan, Iran, Libya, Syria, Saudi Arabia ....

There were people from Pakistan who participated in the IETF.  I 
recall an email exchange where a person from that country received an 
unpleasant comment from someone who is part of the IETF "leadership".

In my opinion a discussion about Country X or Country Y would take 
the thread downhill.  It can also have a chilling effect.

At 05:14 08-09-2013, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>Another worrying aspect of [censored] is that it is named 
>after[censored]. They seem to be looking to make [censored] out of 
>us. They certainly seem to be endorsing [censored]. What should we 
>think if the [censored] had a similar program codenamed [censored]?

It would not look good.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email