Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 13 May 2018 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC64124B17; Sun, 13 May 2018 13:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0QRpdQRGNlLG; Sun, 13 May 2018 13:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x229.google.com (mail-pg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D11126D73; Sun, 13 May 2018 13:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id g20-v6so4579149pgv.1; Sun, 13 May 2018 13:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NdnZXlPNXviLKmLjyuUu4yJqHde2tyknyugZ1wlH9Hs=; b=D8emgtF7wuF3ySQZiY23Wzcjtzgy8b53Ugzd/JmyCi8HQYeAVKfdiGmsSEmVgiGJfb /+z9GGxAg/49slS9bcCME22zwrkNvlwSkdlbCqlJZjI4ehNFp43DhS6H4UHTiwqZQ0A+ CU4KUEwqjpS43QakotYt0ZiPg5QLALYnkHhP97E8yhEcrvcjkomSqbGts8z3nGJXXNGG wmfz5n+V8axGRviK/WoKhZkLkYrgoOo+6EwHZEQy6a0nK3M84G5fPYina8mdgrI39W79 H1rMVXqkyeGRnj3JdLtCok+LQ4s+Wl3QxEcq4rVkDG3SyurUQ9h5HMR9TJTsnqH4J0Fm 3LiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NdnZXlPNXviLKmLjyuUu4yJqHde2tyknyugZ1wlH9Hs=; b=efZaCsbxb8HDdv4Qq5mZ7UvCWidIQW4g7Dhj3Sr3vMHFbkWtHn+woWb05i7LagOuOF Sp3ul+t7IhXqkJaJT29pm7Jmw96DI1vl9tbFb7c4jH2QQQynyYuRP+2alGq/Iq8Jqtp/ HDGO45/HePQ0L80AKsiRtZSjfJRpfqdPTFLhPnzEECiOKc70hdIEkNciND46EF+rvqQ7 L4a0auUGLa7ysElwTa602G9cEkKhyZlccY36C8QpprCUvyKZGFG9M1Dn3NUGr95oYGf/ RWyQ/89BurjpvVawJnW/fzG1OQceq5WxYn2qW7M2fufuY7QK26I5YKtCuSkvQBw+cHyi 4Q6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcQ1AF9tE+FRbXiliMsUQyGpJiXkLMu9EsrB2C7bS/uh+BvjesJ QUaN+zPEZL/fW+O38DPquBzwMQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZp9IcPPb3ACYcXjNvDD5zjg6M8ddmBl2qN3jx6UTIyZ9f9ZXU/ZIGZTBS/JpSOk5BEDTJAp3A==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:61c8:: with SMTP id v191-v6mr6218111pgb.184.1526243289436; Sun, 13 May 2018 13:28:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.27] (211.245.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.245.211]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s6-v6sm12014074pgq.19.2018.05.13.13.28.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 13 May 2018 13:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Brian Carpenter <becarpenter46@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
Cc: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <3678CC52-1F1B-4B17-8654-E75C9B63AD39@ietf.org> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F66B043AE7@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <B0824E35-23D5-4836-8D1B-423830F3E6A8@nohats.ca>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <231886f4-4be3-e614-f3c4-e9cc35163e27@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 08:28:03 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B0824E35-23D5-4836-8D1B-423830F3E6A8@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cm7_xEDXy-I6ZNtqQhbMAzY4A2o>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 20:28:12 -0000

On 14/05/2018 02:17, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On May 13, 2018, at 09:20, Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> IMHO, no meeting on Friday doesn’t really facilitate more unstructured discussion as most people will book flight leaving on Friday if no meeting is scheduled on Friday.
> 
> Exactly what I was thinking,

I think we need to dig a bit deeper.

1) We'ved slowly moved from a meeting that started on Monday morning,
with a couple of tutorials for newcomers on Sunday afternoon, and an
early evening reception on Sunday for those whose flight arrived in time,
to a meeting that for many people starts on Saturday morning.

2) There's an apparent constant of nature, known as N(WG), that hovers
around 120, regardless of how many WGs are created and destroyed.

3) We have constant complaints that WGs hold too many presentation-based
pseudo-discussions and not enough actual discussions.

4) Partly because of 3), we have constant complaints that there isn't
enough informal discussion.

I'm not sure that dropping the Friday morning schedule will fix this.

But that doesn't mean the experiment is a bad thing. Just be prepared
for failure or unexpected consequences.

    Brian