IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Tue, 29 September 2015 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077061B42BF; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ddN_h_4ujuEg; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0131.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0AC61B42C0; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 07:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR05MB1988.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.30) by BLUPR05MB611.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.204.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.280.20; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:38:56 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.27) by BLUPR05MB1988.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.280.20; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:38:55 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) by BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0280.017; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:38:56 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, "draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping.all@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
Thread-Index: AQHQ957UH9WV/iN1dU622TgG5W1zGZ5TmbCQ
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:38:55 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR05MB1985CDFA2E8A95253CE8AB28AE4E0@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <46A1A261-E9F4-414D-AAD8-9C85A8B53283@vigilsec.com> <C04BC7C8-5697-4CE3-B447-FEE7F69FD55C@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <C04BC7C8-5697-4CE3-B447-FEE7F69FD55C@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rbonica@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR05MB1988; 5:EvtqWUHzYAJbbvgx0uh8n5YpJrbq4OAJdhgI21IX5N0ooVCXzKFCYfTGPHgpH43/FfgmR9FSU65EpgAgCfpAh2q7+I5VUjDfH75ljdIvIrtweuoamvbWxf0q3XG/Wzah7Nsg7BPAUm9hdpKDs8Srbw==; 24:RDKuGbDp2GpQP85PY/Nh+ywH54oGMLLVw0IuWWoFH0VLbxxdET725mNbWXUpAhvhCzchCgDwZevioEA1kdIU9VHqDnzCSB5hdLwcrOeD6Tc=; 20:bjHBNZ/Aa7dZ/Yd1JENyiWDrc9w1LBYPnAaDTwrdq9UkNpxcXru4nT6Kl2L+Rbn1yIgYYkAH7s32ttlrh43sjA==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR05MB1988BCF7BA312FD912389BBEAE4E0@BLUPR05MB1988.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(520078)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988;
x-forefront-prvs: 0714841678
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(189002)(377454003)(13464003)(51914003)(377424004)(189998001)(5001960100002)(106116001)(5004730100002)(5002640100001)(15975445007)(77096005)(10400500002)(2900100001)(5007970100001)(68736005)(102836002)(92566002)(5001830100001)(2950100001)(5008740100001)(87936001)(62966003)(5001770100001)(5001860100001)(46102003)(19580405001)(77156002)(97736004)(2501003)(99286002)(105586002)(81156007)(4001540100001)(19580395003)(86362001)(230783001)(66066001)(106356001)(122556002)(101416001)(76176999)(50986999)(40100003)(64706001)(5003600100002)(54356999)(76576001)(33656002)(74316001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988; H:BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Sep 2015 14:38:56.0381 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB1988
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; BLUPR05MB611; 2:VGPD4JdiET/gC7dg8HrVieFGfd6Pmn1JngCEBcjfb4HjR5NY5v52zqcQLbnj2kZGwUGthzIeSwXoUL1Myp5u3FeUDM3LZin6330vHCjAmMy2/BDYYcfI8Og31xzgTZJpvh63m7MmHWEGRhmBt+tEj9PDs3WPQVtxDAVxzpa6f/0=; 23:pTtdYCiM3mMbThq7rgKEL7qZGh6VdwnPw1jjA+C+dwY1Sexaj/7LK2YF5IR/YXggz7PcIVEZkpL8/5LiUXqe+pTGFmsCn6unhb3D36rAaUyR4Zt3OHh6uUGD5Z8G6dGc7zmjzXZpw4MIbDxw/jHMk/4CZTMJha/rdORQd16q7SZ2Jiw3ovGtuxh4DIbHu7bH
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/coddKmnCBz4re2dolUbMavAyBFI>
Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:39:02 -0000

Russ,

Agree on both points. I have:

- removed the word "unique"
- moved Section 6 to an appendix

Thanks for the review.

                                   Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:30 AM
> To: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping.all@ietf.org
> Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>; IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
> Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-
> ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
> may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2014-09-25
> IETF LC End Date: 2014-10-02
> IESG Telechat date: unknown
> 
> Summary:  Ready.
> 
> Major Concerns:  None.
> 
> Minor Concerns:  None.
> 
> Other Comments:
> 
> At the end of Section 1, the document says: "Each protocol listens on its own
> UDP port and executes its own unique procedures."  What does "unique"
> mean here?  What changes if "unique" is dropped from this sentence?
> 
> Would it be more obvious to the reader the purpose of Section 6 if it were
> turned into an appendix?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email