IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Topic IPv6

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 21 November 2016 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACE0129440 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:38:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qv08jLTy1BGZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:38:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x236.google.com (mail-pg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC4DD12940B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:38:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 3so134436601pgd.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:38:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=U9LfN8UhEtpo6Jqu2fKQ6RwLWAaq75aT4bN9A9IuCsg=; b=zVpoOLe1NYxtd3nrFn/wJ2ZhaRYSnKj8+Xui+EyglDD/wVJZBG4fkmpq5/vVDlSlHN FFSV8D52lKwjA3VJPXLxj6AMrVhxS4VHJmypgfJRy7vsGWKUvSX7nJjOmxCnN3jL7MVz tJi9MYKWRhoYTI2kxG04HoyqC87l2StZaMUDRa8xokoFla7bBIm5JluFZ+iWFl6js3qc IQO+jYJPjkcOMBJoY+cn9qjWPnipF/po7i+S/HTrBiNh3Aw9/3gKD2aYhtCOlxBtbEWc BAg3iQqEQVWQrO7Bm3H0oKyfPnWI7wfAh+4rO0FnZWLr/yxMIq3inBS3wY7eNuT8ihzH 4B5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=U9LfN8UhEtpo6Jqu2fKQ6RwLWAaq75aT4bN9A9IuCsg=; b=Fli6OCqnVOFcl5flIatj360eN6J/59XRv3Df7SM4vM/MVRWwoX/s+omQ8N4k3oPE4r 6CMO3aTZpCJSuFiHSUVo8sk//FTTO8Q/aA7v/CMG3mbv8TCppLn+dKGVivI05DuL7yXk azfhl/Mzyru8iePkZkeYwvLmge4FcXw62PXzhX36QJ5FVRSly4c4O2q7qEyAlN1lNl9D QEKBYBY/zOTyRrKRWcgnhnU0sdsxVrf4ulyFXnm+OT7MxDAecv5DdI3aN21f4ntTH1A1 7b2h9GCk1ULdQi61Vl3vMldcD04Z3AnZbVHShdhb7Kk9Linx8ewU9WsKBDvTAUw6lM0B m0gg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01bt/duhn9UIQG94sHJZgEnqyebcq8tlgzvVd/+p0NfXJPDpnv4qWlEQDfNsvDAEA==
X-Received: by 10.98.9.91 with SMTP id e88mr21224889pfd.72.1479764334079; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:38:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df0:0:2006:c0da:ac17:5f6d:8e76? ([2001:df0:0:2006:c0da:ac17:5f6d:8e76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h7sm21666029pgn.13.2016.11.21.13.38.52 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:38:53 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Topic IPv6
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAGxDXJ9L-Zfu+Wn8MogOn_yKgDKKuUVyqNp5mxNYaJZd-371qA@mail.gmail.com> <20161121135800.hj773gvjquay7ka5@nic.fr> <CAGxDXJ_j+U2yngKPqK+ciHSG9B2CsTRYPq8swqbVZZBOfYB37Q@mail.gmail.com> <20161121145039.p56dd5cpczxaivyl@nic.fr> <CAGxDXJ_zAXt_QD8vpW29vShV1enXewQ1sshZfOQd+WMU17=DTA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGxDXJ-Hkvfh=E_C8ReqBE-LoN+cRR9g5d=ZnusapoNSw3i8yQ@mail.gmail.com> <04c201d24434$2329dd20$697d9760$@tndh.net> <alpine.LRH.2.00.1611211520170.27805@post.law.miami.edu>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <173a46ff-5dba-3dd5-85d8-eb69b9c25cd3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:38:53 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1611211520170.27805@post.law.miami.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cpNVUu1duRv851MYjkmBaJlRBGI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 21:38:56 -0000

On 22/11/2016 09:42, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2016, Tony Hain wrote:
> 
>> The IETF has taken a position that its job is creating technologies and 
>> that it is someone else's job to deal with the political implications of 
>> those.
>>
> 
> 
> Is that now the rule?  Have RFCs 1984 & 2804 been superseded?

Those RFCs were very carefully drafted to be based on technical issues
concerned with security. It's true that they have implications for
policy makers, and that they are inconvenient for policy makers who
prefer to deny technical reality.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email