IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Planned changes to registration payments & deadlines

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Tue, 24 April 2018 06:49 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8E4126D0C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 23:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GLDviLu7itgp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 23:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com (mail-wr0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3B9A12420B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 23:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id g21-v6so19962657wrb.8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 23:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kgEnxmN0bNP1YlnjrH6sJ/BplIe0ASOpobGbgqOZIFQ=; b=P+gSJ2K/GCMJTFGDKxedcaqBHzlnsWsrbs97vvi2MAvBHKVVK8GLeEOgLTP5678+/K /sT5k4tAzwe1zEiQPVoeQN2TcPu6J52DGC6r1zQwqpeGoaQq1k2HpY4OqHhzGw05Xv8G B8ydcw6Rt4yMqA0ESD4dJiLpYnLbmzbyKLIEm+ADHUufdHB+k2NeWfTkYLsGIp6Lz5Qp 0RiCmqx2kXCsokisppEovWlxe8yApqIC/gdxHEaJ4DZrphPTc/wUerAeUDAdwIpGGz51 /S52TXqnLA4m/RoqEw85H1sho4dKar2HzI9a2gN/6o5VFWLNoEW6jOfReyOwQOVqkxd3 k7LQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kgEnxmN0bNP1YlnjrH6sJ/BplIe0ASOpobGbgqOZIFQ=; b=AEQIiOHeT8SVZ5OwTV1G3/wNVEaj81RUyJcEyzGcGi3tbHkf9bM3k4BgNDNHe7QefQ P+kj2xDdJSL3wDfEH31tZ2qBXV4iQMd5wUZe89whJ3inU29Osc89aIzqL+jZsB9eE9AF ZyZPYonn7JXQbnZi0BxGeCOKY2Cg2WWOgY1M7OOryM0k1VVg7DDHDbPDoEU6f5cxcbHD uUwtYgCab1zJAhaRoHq9gX60bn87ySunokj1tTjBm7X/Y85/OikyYxnDQuDiQJ0jM+si d+HoBxMS+jgLcTvLBeE0J/HbuLkVBudWBKpApPapSpWN2sjk3boF+YbS68tyKtdyCWW8 4LhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDS2mteK+uLaCxyprmk8TN5RnSIKj3+Vdj47mj12X+we7INV4Q8 4LlZUScT/WqaRNROafA16IHsN7iT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/7kdaNsKGusLvv2WQ5OMus+K3BRDm3MvWww6nJPewbLklGzsCX/Dh7JZe8kdScUOT2hahlkw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:8b44:: with SMTP id v4-v6mr18057636wra.99.1524552592282; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 23:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.182] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q194sm10723228wmd.26.2018.04.23.23.49.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Apr 2018 23:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Planned changes to registration payments & deadlines
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15E216)
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-e+aCpCDjN=ExUiB+iQvEFTrsgJVYWFG-jdR39qkj1+OA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 07:49:50 +0100
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, IETF list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5E509CB4-949A-4890-B510-CFA90416940C@gmail.com>
References: <20180419174627.2krzjbxgx25s5wxz@mx4.yitter.info> <20180423162016.elmju5r6qcb6xcbt@anvilwalrusden.com> <49c1c20d-000c-9664-d998-cace737704d8@gmail.com> <dc8c4b1c-450d-a548-1503-5fc296448898@nostrum.com> <CAKKJt-e+aCpCDjN=ExUiB+iQvEFTrsgJVYWFG-jdR39qkj1+OA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cvKJdetx3UuEltInwH3QYiyNv6c>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 06:49:56 -0000


Sent from my iPad

> On 24 Apr 2018, at 07:13, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> A couple of interactions about meeting fees ago, someone made the point that $1000 US was a common point where additional approvals are required. If people are in that situation, they have more incentive than others to register early at $700. Even the standard rate plus VAT puts you over $1000, doesn't it?

So shouldn’t we act like marketeers on this and set the price at $999?

Indeed I would take $1 off each of the prices for approval psychology reasons.

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email