Re: new directions in mlm traffic: integration

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 10 January 2021 03:19 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A023A0AFB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 19:19:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=qRDb2/5F; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=DeIKnamw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dWlLSfLqM8yu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 19:19:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FBF23A0AFA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 19:19:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 32519 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2021 03:19:23 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7f04.5ffa723b.k2101; bh=MgDAa3ofig6OzUgMODMDx43s+wSgrVvAnJKE2FoCUWk=; b=qRDb2/5F0l/tRusBjtnE5QqtTrAOza4+2jun4/GkbD8Ja7+ArXCXKNmNoYf7lwsKkG+y+QKsRQBzDYn5pC3gb3uLo8zxXP3BdLv3zZYb35YXTU1vcrYR9HTpYGvNclsKtGFp04QW+whvo7LaY8qfD1aes+ujggOF2Ttojs0T7TlTW3sOBh7TByyp4cY6pflJ3KGrk9eyeckSpWtPS+oc72tQyM01dh0iZf+eAjg4BVX4C58X5ww1ffojAqmCFwG9rsYD8SjAGKQMeifGsJ5yzx6PiH8WnL23D1nqZU93F8BXLIHTg9QNr4kmA2zpaEn/Qo9+ifHafiAN/mSa1Svcsw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7f04.5ffa723b.k2101; bh=MgDAa3ofig6OzUgMODMDx43s+wSgrVvAnJKE2FoCUWk=; b=DeIKnamw1s8JfvzSLrM1L6hPRtl/EBtVZiNILvv8GIQLwNpeLTLfDJ2Rs/OTLEdi8i0GXqzLs9C0eeqFPXOpmMrRlqtIuMAsrRTEixu20qo/HKbpitoQWbNfzgeZ9MtnUlmp+9i7pXW6i8UYDIUvwHfw9Uejku34Rd4bZhl321aZGrhdOtooggTqEA76g1JxTIvS7C33F29OQDAOZlJTCjstb8v9b35Upyecho2/HW3lYwiArV7B6LeK5VZN8R1W3N7eRkZE1+2U1LQd7WTsx6dutDleHgnwbGu9/s/hVbue+shVywzMg76fUkqyBtRDqxxni/NKmlL+zC4qskUoLQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 10 Jan 2021 03:19:23 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 92D4B68A9C94; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 22:19:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:19:21 -0500
Message-Id: <20210110031922.92D4B68A9C94@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: new directions in mlm traffic: integration
In-Reply-To: <e2f6e069-3b1e-7f5c-0b1e-955170e6618a@mtcc.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cy_Vrr-oWo2-vytD9iKJFwCLCjE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 03:19:27 -0000

In article <e2f6e069-3b1e-7f5c-0b1e-955170e6618a@mtcc.com> you write:
>Forum software has been around for decades at this point though and 
>doesn't have the limitations of being tied to MUA UI. ...

>If there's any interest, I could write an I-D with it a little bit more 
>baked. Apologies if this has already been discussed.

It sems ike a reasonable thing to look into but I'd think a more
productive way to go would be to see what software already exists that
does this kind of stuff, preferably with credible paid support. We
already have too much custom bespoke stuff for applications that
aren't really all that unusual.

R's,
John