IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 09 December 2014 03:15 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A5C1A013B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:15:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ocdx3X5Ym8El for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x229.google.com (mail-pd0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0DF01A00AE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:15:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id z10so6408288pdj.14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:15:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gd9PTV2LUkRlu0YbFhdz8RUcrlFnmxywdGVeINHWiHQ=; b=JVhtbzv0dw+BFQ7ICk1PK/+equ5ufsJ2P5B4yAe1DtjggjKXCehldGwEBzOR2H0E7d +IlnCBWFNBzzL7MuDij0Bx7wNViuDkgjvh9JU6gEjUvjH+sEN3/0evspSL6SiF0HuZq3 iouvlfVXU7shcDONJpIAHZoyWys8vZPx0d7s8oKlM0OvylXwf7n7CwX+TYlGiGpRwbyo fUK9cWqhcSF8btZh8+8lQOhjuO7rtEAJ0y0ZnYj+FIzK4zdQyD7gYIunEqFyVSdh5XoP 2MQfSneDSkJeEOgOIdeVg7jDKjGPCQagOzMsn769bA1UbLmjQZDhq+z3IGsvv9Usy2Av o+IQ==
X-Received: by 10.70.102.234 with SMTP id fr10mr26383091pdb.145.1418094926091; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:15:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.26] (220.227.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.227.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id va2sm37915008pac.15.2014.12.08.19.15.23 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5486694E.905@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:15:26 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-secretaries-good-practices-06.txt> (IETF Working Groups' Secretaries) to Best Current Practice
References: <20140612132656.8100.57197.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwZEo-AN4Er0gmbCyWJwTqOKBUKKMHEMQ_YqhK+oB+pcgg@mail.gmail.com> <547E9DBA.9040703@pi.nu> <0c1001d00ee9$36598670$a30c9350$@olddog.co.uk> <D51141636F7AC8CBFE11FA93@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <547F23AD.90206@gmail.com> <F1301BDF5BA91E9561C6654C@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <0c7901d00f12$f6790a60$e36b1f20$@olddog.co.uk> <547F37C7.6030207@gmail.com> <0cbf01d00f1f$853f10d0$8fbd3270$@olddog.co.uk> <547F4CF2.9020707@gmail.com> <m261dnje1v.wl%randy@psg.com> <9DD12708-7020-4F59-9A58-40A74E9E96FA@gmail.com> <54860203.4050906@gmail.com> <548608B0.5090100@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbjEZ779+kyokZ3ojBt5Uq7M+y__3CX1FXdszbJ3Ck5Ww@mail.gmail.com> <54860DBA.1010206@alcatel-lucent.com> <54861D7F.402@gmail.com> <029501d01340$730f6d90$592e48b0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <029501d01340$730f6d90$592e48b0$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cz2DHvqcPTrX2qkCk5nYgPlU7sQ
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 03:15:28 -0000

On 09/12/2014 12:41, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>>> Section 6:
>>>    Nevertheless, while the WG Chairs may delegate a number of tasks to
>>>    the Secretary, they maintain the overall responsibility and
>>>    accountability over the WG and the decisions and actions that are
>>>    taken.
>> Which is good stuff, like most of the content. I think the
>> argument is not about the quality of the draft, but about
>> whether it needs to be a BCP.
> 
> If only the "argument" was founded on reading the draft!

No, founded on reading the subject line of the Last Call message.
It seems that I missed a "downgrade" of the Last Call.

I don't object to this as Informational.

  Brian


> 
> Network Working Group                                      M. Vigoureux
> Internet Draft                                           Alcatel-Lucent
> Intended status: Informational                                  D. King
> Expires: May 2015                                    Old Dog Consulting
>                                                            C. Pignataro
>                                                     Cisco Systems, Inc.
> 
>                                                       November 11, 2014
> 
>                      IETF Working Groups' Secretaries
>                     draft-secretaries-good-practices-07
> 
> Who is currently asking for this to be a BCP?
> And why are we having that "argument"?
> 
> Adrian
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email