Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases

Glen <glen@amsl.com> Tue, 03 January 2017 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <glen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB79E1296AA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:52:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d_KlKdK0VEGS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6D7C12968B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66F0D1E5664 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com (mail-lf0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04F8D1E5663 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id t196so294057381lff.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 13:52:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLb7XE9qjNPAH8ffrhKLuAfdQyBbhPOehumobGXmyvqddu6LCyQM7H3MxwLEIDVCEoDOBHp15rDdTVmLQ==
X-Received: by 10.46.21.6 with SMTP id s6mr23879099ljd.73.1483480331597; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 13:52:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.200.6 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:51:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <116d3e8a-b75a-ed55-51e5-7d81d7bcf83e@nostrum.com>
References: <095301d26601$72b1c8a0$581559e0$@huitema.net> <C7B14253-C116-4181-8F7B-2D7CDCE80C81@dukhovni.org> <116d3e8a-b75a-ed55-51e5-7d81d7bcf83e@nostrum.com>
From: Glen <glen@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 13:51:51 -0800
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CABL0ig70vMwc85eNOLLbz+tT53cDuxBO2d8mE6bswmn2mjgVHA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABL0ig70vMwc85eNOLLbz+tT53cDuxBO2d8mE6bswmn2mjgVHA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/d6M9tVXtCL0037337jEd7mpzM8I>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: glen@amsl.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 21:52:15 -0000

On 1/3/17 2:54 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> IIRC Glen from AMSL reads this list, in which case the message has already
> reached the right ears.

Hi Viktor and everyone -

Thank you for the vote of confidence.  :-)

I actually do not normally subscribe to this list, for bandwidth
reasons; however, many people know how to reach me directly when there
is a concern, so I stay pretty well-informed (as I did in this case!)

I'm on vacation until January 9th, but since I was summoned by name
:-) I just wanted to respond back to let you all know that I'm aware
of this situation with the aliases.

And, in this particular case, the TMC is directly managing concerns
regarding SPF/DKIM/DMARC/etc and with Robert's response you can be
sure that they, too, now, are aware of this, and will take it under
advisement.

Thanks, and Happy New Year to you all.

Glen
--
Glen Barney
IT Director
AMS (IETF Secretariat)