IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Quality of Directorate reviews

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Wed, 13 November 2019 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5493412080C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:25:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ty65t4g0RSxB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:25:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9E4D12002E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 07:25:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5962F22243; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:25:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:25:18 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=6swV1d r34GPzf1KuEQiZesD/dTN7yWOo/mvNG597dpE=; b=sMa64h1a1DTRuWrxKSD0EP xVFjHKqqpR9yyVvCJSaziGOi8s4K48TRiaGSKZLVWpb7wuJZV7g2ze3SA5DydxTq iagmXgdNpI2i72SZM4cHBVH8n7uiKeZSx7hzM1sSk3wnSP6j5bZjkppgDhXXgyVn NBIACzRUbqJrtBD9EbPeGq1p4S9fEzuLtGTwwuk6xP3JOXAiQQhtTGVlKTNHEx6l fBOscpmZi8y6TPMWC9ClAOC+MieSjUEbK5BWaj0db9lGQsR9et7ljND6C9J6RxLh mQtMV2Wgig54QlG4ucECwn49dQt3gxNu3wZluCMtMhl9gopIfQCmS4QmDP8APg/Q ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:XiDMXb2QC5pKYsNB_kdltegCEpimMbAI4mGzGn3zn786dJVihGTF9Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudefuddgjeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgesrgdtre ertdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfiho rhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecukfhppedutdekrddvvddurddukedtrdduhe enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgv thhitghsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:XiDMXa13pZC-92THz-LJezprnrKqlS8crDZ_d683Kr442a7iNMEM7w> <xmx:XiDMXUySOsfqv7JfQxz6OKNh6tWe7aAKkM6_2DZCzXwWSNWIEttKSg> <xmx:XiDMXYsoD3_tH1qXXFyPs5i-IuPgJ3K1VVtjQplcbUWCVGOiIK1Oow> <xmx:XiDMXTQpHE2rdBQdEX03cyA6Jt_NzjS5vMNCSzNw2gibILmoNOG_Kw>
Received: from [192.168.1.97] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C13643060062; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:25:17 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Quality of Directorate reviews
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <157279399807.13506.13363770981495597049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EF64763-BA25-468A-B387-91445A61D318@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUovmFmgNiYx0ez_1f+GPdU9xGViDYWfowEEomrn0pyDw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040841160.27600@bofh.nohats.ca> <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com> <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com> <09886edb-4302-b309-9eaa-f016c4487128@gmail.com> <26819.1572990657@localhost> <2668fa45-7667-51a6-7cb6-4b704c7fba5a@isode.com> <2C97D18E-3DA0-4A2D-8179-6D86EB835783@gmail.com> <MN2PR11MB43669E4CEF13CDA51A764F9AB5790@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <20191.1573054128@localhost> <15BCDF05-FB13-45D2-A5DF-70618EBA1A5A@gmail.com> <9182.1573147520@localhost> <A3493C65-7F8A-407D-A9F4-FF36296C0920@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwiP4Ypuyh2xsd8qBjUfwuNzOYOfp3OrDnPmU-YwMH2pMw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <02eb79d1-1830-5830-ed95-b743f601a8de@network-heretics.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:25:16 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwiP4Ypuyh2xsd8qBjUfwuNzOYOfp3OrDnPmU-YwMH2pMw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0276882F7DA301D23038B956"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/d84nfIN-pfe9dYr_u-9owv__LBQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:25:20 -0000

On 11/13/19 10:07 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> Maybe what we need is a structure that assigns multiple reviewers for 
> some projects and rubber stamps others.

Seems like ADs already have a fair amount of discretion to ask for 
multiple in-depth reviewers vs. getting minimal review.   If having a 
human make such decisions isn't your idea of an appropriate "structure", 
I'd be curious to know what is.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email