IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 27 March 2020 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003883A0765 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LG65LZf5KUo7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D0823A03EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 06:20:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02RDIeUu008567; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:19:30 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=+Y8PymEoUUQZCuxk2FWJ7eGhq35xecIoGEqp4YZ5qYs=; b=H7Zk3kUthccYRIpv/EOf0n2Zvjagc9mZKHrUhPRJ+ugQut3SBOLmittskClRXYyZSeMj CIjhpLFq5dSxm8nrpVsKw970p89cRSFwjM13P478sxslnrc6zvNGdMMW37QLXzpA3zzT 72aBD26xeotmXfIt6GY1nIo2rkqQkEA9aqbNBxWpkNyQfo7KkLvjiNyraMcBpPTOsA7r KjM+qFg1PhVkSJLRWdLhIXO2QSqi9CAbEwADr6w9j6OHi/CBFjFaLKoL3zOoN6ayGe0z rA87kC4LFW5T/THs3Jnt8kSYyMPbZShqo9yzGNDktE0NELqrLSKyONRkzLpF+L/8YkaB QA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2yyt8fw4dg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:19:30 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 02RDHBj0005781; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:19:29 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2ywe8uk154-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:19:29 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:19:28 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 09:19:28 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
CC: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Thread-Topic: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
Thread-Index: AQHV+T17YIte9GVOtUSJhAMBWIG3LKhaRrUA///IIwCAAWKlgP//y0WAgAFwXwD//9UTAA==
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:19:28 +0000
Message-ID: <4D107420-6FA8-4053-A0E1-8728AA34C2BD@akamai.com>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <55D8F3C6-7F2A-4382-AFFD-B8A1D7C14992@akamai.com> <28066.1585242203@localhost> <2118E3F9-03DE-4663-B648-7BC95AFEDFC1@akamai.com> <9C9C6A76-DA41-44F1-86FF-CCEA89227732@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <9C9C6A76-DA41-44F1-86FF-CCEA89227732@eggert.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.118.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <27C5CEE58691F24EACD29E2F65DEBEB0@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.645 definitions=2020-03-27_04:2020-03-27, 2020-03-27 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=345 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002250000 definitions=main-2003270123
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.645 definitions=2020-03-27_04:2020-03-27, 2020-03-27 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=332 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003270123
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dBOn5Gui5qVmBpc6e0MbHfXQhRo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:20:40 -0000

>    But: My guess is that any fine-tuning here would not make a huge difference to the size of the pool of people eligible to be considered as voting members.
  
We could approximate based on how many "newcomers" are at IETF.  My guess it would be more than negligible.  Whose guess wins?

>    Anyone got data on #eligible vs. #volunteered?
  
And what about my idea of mailing people who qualify, reminding them that they're qualified to serve?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email