Re: Forced virtual IETF 109 as well as 107

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Sun, 15 March 2020 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77503A1C58 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-MNxCD39Wjd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B2C43A1C96 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 02FL5W9R042909; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:05:32 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 39BCA20111F; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:05:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3BB200B5B; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:05:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.113.150] ([10.8.113.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 02FL5Vrv006929; Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:05:31 +0100
Subject: Re: Forced virtual IETF 109 as well as 107
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <C9E8B3DAE355FAD80C21236C@PSB> <1UW5qAlIZh.2Vbp3oIhq6g@pc8xp> <683bb0d2-2d0d-041f-4d06-759c728025ec@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200314170427.0bd33fd0@elandnews.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b73c8369-1541-b42e-3622-d1023a348fa2@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:05:31 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200314170427.0bd33fd0@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dCN_bTyw5pFMMG2VsqCNWim74xA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 21:05:53 -0000

Le 15/03/2020 à 02:20, S Moonesamy a écrit :
> Hi Alex,
> At 11:41 AM 13-03-2020, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>> It's an event of cold, but heat countries in Africa have it too, even 
>> though a little less.  It's an event of winter, because world maps of 
>> distribution, show currently much distribution in Northern 
>> hemisphere, and little in the Southern hemisphere.  When the Earth 
>> will incline the other way, will the virus with a crown disappear or 
>> move the other way too.
>
> The magnitude of R0 in some parts of the Southern Hemisphere might be 
> related to travel and several other factors.


What do you mean by R0?

Indeed, it might be so.  I do not know.  I am just struck by seeing the 
map how it is.  I do not know.


>
> The "loss" from attendance is currently at least $706,875.  The amount 
> will likely double by the end of July.  That is another aspect of 
> potential issues which the IETF might face.


For the amounts of money.

I understand no attendant to IETF Vancouver was not reimbursed; or they 
are all about to get reimbursed.   (I think?)

For the sources of money.  Currently several sources of money are being 
made available to compensate to many things, such as tele-work, or 
'partial no-work' and many others.  There are specific budgets to SMEs 
as well.  At a high level, China claimed injecting 130M dollar 
(milliard, i.e. billion in English); America talked about 50, France 
about 15 or so.  Other countries too. These numbers are non negligible.

Alex

>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy