Re: Strong objection to draft-ietf-WG-*.all noise levels

[Robert Sparks <[e-mail]>]

On 3/9/15 8:03 AM, George, Wes wrote:
> On 3/6/15, 4:47 PM, "Robert Sparks" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> We are also continuing to work on improving the issues that started the
>> threads sharing the Subject of this message at a high priority.
> My other reply (albeit hidden under my signature which I stupidly forgot
> to remove from the top of the message) quotes a part of a previous message
> implying that this was already fixed, but I am still receiving messages
> sent to e.g. [e-mail] that
> are forwarding to [e-mail] without adding that address to the To:
> field. Is this still in the process of being fixed, or do you want
> examples of this because it's supposed to be fixed?
Yes, we are still working on that.
>   It is unclear from
> your previous message.
>
> Thanks
> Wes
>
>
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.