Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ?
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Wed, 11 March 2020 22:54 UTC
Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3DC3A091C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.645
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.645 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ab7FD-GZK39M for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-f51.google.com (mail-ot1-f51.google.com [209.85.210.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF94E3A0917 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id j16so4002330otl.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H4bILrROqUigArWqex5/z/sQA8gEcIIr2x9wJWQBzjQ=; b=lIzv3c6NVgxcjzTVjrnEQe6mKE+rrhzclklTiPbMRSqULl5HTE5Sj24nxL0BMP7DaW OjiJ6dFey84XNcxXOlxjKqet85Jz5oIK/UGgpgj2sH54PyBcXWpoqaB7HOxF5AR5wjos aGWdzSeWz/P3uPTVuiIhGIa0v66ucUZO8E3WCiL+RAdwDIAMff6oPoXQYm8JZIKpmpTH FFc0vK5birwIkveXUkdnFuyo87DwrMVwRwDkoCGjHvWL6ijZwnfDR2drleUGkVAZc6Tq bgZxgd2IjKxh7p9NKWMe4yI2+iGdsSYRsmi32/2ZY7X9aQTQnsgr7SSIV/wwe2MVP21/ 3nCQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2s4QwS2lA9dm7JKbBMwqentRihAd7ZgLcriKTJpBVLZw5uW4na hH8h6PmuYdj3Of/gdiBbaJ9Ki/ndS3uTpJ80kA63xqqx
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vt+eZYvAwZuWYbR2DVfTgfIruu7Jp6bEqk770BP7ffkBIwBC7IkONnM8ZFLwgF6NWIlbVKXS1DsSeUV1AoKDeU=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7cda:: with SMTP id r26mr4006773otn.64.1583967277095; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200311224912.GJ13518@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200311224912.GJ13518@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:54:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwixhVoxPtz+ZGgoV6tV6GR_KqEPZMdLRpy2qFdhfWXtDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ?
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e31e4f05a09c1edd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dW4zVCnTjBWx8YjbcaGszrvCIpA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 22:54:39 -0000
Keep them for Madrid which will now be IETF 107. Of course, now that I have pointed that out, a virtual IETF may well be inescapable even if it is only a proforma virtual plenary. That would address John's point about seating the new IESG. On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 6:50 PM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote: > In case (as i am assuming), these have already been printed, > > How can we get them ? > > Please don't tell me they can be picked up in a landfill somewhere > like the first electric cars... > > I can drive to the LLC if that's where they are ;-)) > > Cheers > Toerless > >
- How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? Toerless Eckert
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? Damm, Benjamin
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? Carsten Bormann
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? John C Klensin
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? Toerless Eckert
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? John C Klensin
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? Bob Hinden
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? Toerless Eckert
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? Carsten Bormann
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirts ? Joseph Potvin
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirt… Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirt… Qiuyuefeng (Ryan)
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: How about the IETF 107 T-Shirt… Melchior Aelmans