IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 09 August 2012 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8213921F86D4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.16 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HLaIdk5a-qlC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC0421F86D3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 45061 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2012 22:04:54 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 9 Aug 2012 22:04:54 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=50243406.xn--btvx9d.k1208; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=N0qWir5MudlzYSDOn1CpPR/xO/x2zMrWB2EFhcIsoQA=; b=ogNZS7W4xMg9MZMmT1w/BtKxK2EJKSbamJOVvOM0P/yLPPg7FnB86t8X+bpHMgRKbi2AW/J+qRRYn7HPr10N4WqI8O8JMzxarGUhBmnH4XfAVSvZwV1vRtTTNrLPUXGLVb/I/PO2qmmvgrTnOKG0NU6IJ9EKROYoBMDFFNJG7zk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=50243406.xn--btvx9d.k1208; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=N0qWir5MudlzYSDOn1CpPR/xO/x2zMrWB2EFhcIsoQA=; b=E/yAv87McAY80RxSxxdpeOCDirQ3uCFoOSDQfHlAq3CAIXetYDttAm8KVQ/Yr+un9sEaZipFpRyNYyMVG8aKqVy4BtM4hWPmeyPgF+98ftBWQnvSuLM0BKNXeEu2KoQnu+9YMEQyom3yusqbq1x9f7ct7sCf5z+wEKwqTDJXFFw=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:04:32 -0000
Message-ID: <20120809220432.83061.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
In-Reply-To: <5024241A.8040804@dcrocker.net>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:04:58 -0000

>This is worth mentioning because the MY formal rule is not strict
>prohibition but a formal visa process that is so onerous as to equate to
>a prohibition.

Wouldn't that rule out the United States?  It is my impression that
getting a US visa for someone with a Cuban or Iranian passport is
effectively impossible.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email