RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Tue, 01 March 2016 18:01 UTC

From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: "'Black, David'" <david.black@emc.com>, draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all@tools.ietf.org
References: <00b001d162a0$800314b0$80093e10$@gmail.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493623E85A06@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493623E85A06@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 20:00:52 +0200
Message-ID: <0cf001d173e4$4c8d2030$e5a76090$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0CF1_01D173F5.101776D0"
Thread-Index: AQImB8/thamhHsAKXjr09uaT0Xc8rgKGGdtGnoeIE7A=
Content-Language: he
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/daPrY4vP620tMSnhnDPtBtdkCas>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: list

Hi David,

This will be good.

Thanks

Roni

 

From: Black, David [mailto:david.black@emc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:26 PM
To: Roni Even; draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

 

Hi Roni,

Looks like this was missed - sorry for the absence of a response.

WRT section 6.3.2 (now section 5.3.2) "persistently fails to deliver
acceptable TDM service" is discussed in significant detail in Appendix A of
the referenced [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] - it turns out to be a much longer
discussion by comparison to section 6.3.1 (now section 5.3.1) that involves
references to ITU-T G.826 and G.875.  I'd prefer not to reproduce or try to
summarize that discussion in the tsvwg-circuit-breaker draft, but a sentence
could be added to the end of that section to point the reader in the right
direction, e.g.: "See Appendix A of [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] for further
discussion."

Thanks, --David

 

From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 1:43 PM
To: draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

 

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2016-2-8

IETF LC End Date: 2016-2-9

IESG Telechat date: 

 

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a BCP RFC.

 

 

 

Major issues:

 

 

Minor issues:

 

In section 6.3.2 the proposal is "For that reason, the draft suggests that a
managed circuit breaker that shuts down a PW when it persistently fails to
deliver acceptable TDM service is a useful means for addressing these
congestion concerns." I accepted to see some definition of "persistently
fails" at least similar to section 6.3.1. 

 

 

Nits/editorial comments:

Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-bre… Roni Even
RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit… Black, David
RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit… Roni Even
Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit… Jari Arkko