RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Tue, 01 March 2016 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DCD1B3112; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:01:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O9Tdzl25gelw; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:01:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACB2D1B3111; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 10:01:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id l68so47049259wml.0; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 10:01:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=eEiORIsjAzZkxm7PkEQBvSWJmgmnsBwHVT/mkAlY7j0=; b=SowlDwS2TI18WZMS2ENt+ZG3AAIL5TVpWx7dIOCF5iYCmKaS1UpL/KcVCh3gHIGScl OUI8HdEz21GdXMkcC/z5pzqzRjqPXcHeSrecKYkeGE//pI7rgQXbWwA1XeqNNor+keCK IzpDwPvWfTbEQkccYJcsr9a4qYylTxm2PfSp/nyIP5WMUa+UjYwFkcrNTqyizmJIeo0g gAQ/jcKP1FRNW+umeQ3hyVK6gsDyQkgGWjh+1IdJYkXxKIt41ctjm9pV2KU5OL2m2i/1 16d2AkxKgb3z/x1i5fm+FjXebPTQtdTcJYhjtsdZtu7+llLFwyTd7slYD1j17OBpjK9p WHiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:thread-index:content-language; bh=eEiORIsjAzZkxm7PkEQBvSWJmgmnsBwHVT/mkAlY7j0=; b=QoLz7+NNLQaBfnNO2ydQigmTL4cWgYBlvZaWGzVjnAe1aVGZyoJjZXcNezVH2QEKSc 8R7Dtztfepz0Gj46sWTTegKMGTCRgoYyJuIowPpdC6u/jIxNQRPrW3+PqfOsjU1E+b16 scegjWieOWiPMD5tz7yV3P0LccdcbIDOHWnAT+Dps3i+/ptDmtIdlQ4GxwEW3jNc5lJn ORQjp2G6Hxt1oXuehKGPEoU7eCwUo3hJ0GNjCDBvRqi+p2Yojq03AHt+0sXBPLm01tHZ 7XsX2r8CI96jmPcHv0KNPLC5xBHHqa2tD713lwiZvCqVDYVFadjdEPGy+5PAZqNusrtk 07YA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLYohhMn0+b4Idvrw6ciPXttyKSE26poJ5BVK7pswD56j5RznX69kLFl25ntSJsqg==
X-Received: by 10.28.146.202 with SMTP id u193mr341223wmd.82.1456855267117; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 10:01:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from RoniPC (bzq-79-177-19-17.red.bezeqint.net. [79.177.19.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 63sm310780wms.1.2016.03.01.10.01.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Mar 2016 10:01:05 -0800 (PST)
From: "Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: "'Black, David'" <david.black@emc.com>, <draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all@tools.ietf.org>
References: <00b001d162a0$800314b0$80093e10$@gmail.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493623E85A06@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493623E85A06@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com>
Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 20:00:52 +0200
Message-ID: <0cf001d173e4$4c8d2030$e5a76090$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0CF1_01D173F5.101776D0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQImB8/thamhHsAKXjr09uaT0Xc8rgKGGdtGnoeIE7A=
Content-Language: he
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/daPrY4vP620tMSnhnDPtBtdkCas>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 18:01:13 -0000

Hi David,

This will be good.

Thanks

Roni

 

From: Black, David [mailto:david.black@emc.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:26 PM
To: Roni Even; draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

 

Hi Roni,

Looks like this was missed - sorry for the absence of a response.

WRT section 6.3.2 (now section 5.3.2) "persistently fails to deliver
acceptable TDM service" is discussed in significant detail in Appendix A of
the referenced [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] - it turns out to be a much longer
discussion by comparison to section 6.3.1 (now section 5.3.1) that involves
references to ITU-T G.826 and G.875.  I'd prefer not to reproduce or try to
summarize that discussion in the tsvwg-circuit-breaker draft, but a sentence
could be added to the end of that section to point the reader in the right
direction, e.g.: "See Appendix A of [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] for further
discussion."

Thanks, --David

 

From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 1:43 PM
To: draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

 

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2016-2-8

IETF LC End Date: 2016-2-9

IESG Telechat date: 

 

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a BCP RFC.

 

 

 

Major issues:

 

 

Minor issues:

 

In section 6.3.2 the proposal is "For that reason, the draft suggests that a
managed circuit breaker that shuts down a PW when it persistently fails to
deliver acceptable TDM service is a useful means for addressing these
congestion concerns." I accepted to see some definition of "persistently
fails" at least similar to section 6.3.1. 

 

 

Nits/editorial comments: