Re: Concerns about Singapore

[Jared Mauch <[e-mail]>]

I would suggest European networks have quite different content than elsewhere as a result of local censorship laws and other rights afforded to people in the region. 

Jared Mauch

> On Apr 10, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Michael StJohns <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On 4/10/2016 10:45 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>> it was clean unfettered Internet.  some local folk stuck their necks out
>>>> very far to accomplish this.  it was definitely different than one got
>>>> outside of the ietf meeting network.  this has been a condition placed
>>>> on hosts and beijing was no exception.
>>> This surprises me - "this has been a condition placed on hosts...".
>> it was even in the hour of embarrassing babble fred used to prevent
>> people from talking about real problems at the bof
>> 
>>> Could you enlighten us as to which [and I'll try to be precise here]
>>> other IETFs had a condition where the content accessible by the IETF
>>> network was markedly different from the content of say the network at
>>> a local Starbuck's equivalent wifi hot spot just down the street from
>>> the IETF and where that was mandated by the hosts and/or local laws?
>>> I mean besides Beijing?  Key words "markedly different" and "content
>>> accessible".
>> we don't specify it's 'different'.  among other silly distractions, it
>> would require a 'different from precisely what and in what ways?'
>> 
>> we simply specifiy open and unfettered
> 
> I repeat - "where" have the local hosts/laws specified conditions that resulted in the IETF network content access being markedly different than that accessible to the random local citizen?
> 
> 
>> 
>> rndy