IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Basic ietf process question ...

ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com Sat, 04 August 2012 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4677121F86C9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 11:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EPlcN6UqR91a for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 11:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24EA21F86C6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 11:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OINK3SF7JK006G56@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 11:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01OIGH28IS2O0006TF@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 11:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com
Message-id: <01OINK3QSJXO0006TF@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 11:54:39 -0700
Subject: Re: Basic ietf process question ...
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Sat, 04 Aug 2012 10:52:37 -0500" <1D580354-3D3D-424B-8DE8-C5C436E8B14D@mnot.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN
References: <20120802055556.1356.17133.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJK6RE1pnk0RJZjpU8jHb9KKb3zOjGc5NqTcVyb7kTBOyw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZaoVDtt_8o1Qr5NqG-rBk6jkAMMVT+jUUoiD2rhEvmuw@mail.gmail.com> <501AA9DF.6010208@raszuk.net> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0407E24713@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <501AB4F5.7030205@raszuk.net> <501AC2C7.6040707@gmail.com> <270DDF46-AA04-49C0-B54C-35FD0AE0350F@mnot.net> <01OIMHY7BVKK0006TF@mauve.mrochek.com> <8D242074-DA5B-4C31-807D-79116517A64D@mnot.net> <01OIMJ1NAB5W0006TF@mauve.mrochek.com> <1D580354-3D3D-424B-8DE8-C5C436E8B14D@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com, opsawg@ietf.org, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, "ietf@ietf.org list" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 18:57:34 -0000

> On 03/08/2012, at 8:09 PM, ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:

> >> Very much; when it becomes a "document" (e.g., mixed markup), XML is a much
> >> better choice.
> >
> > The other interesting case is where large amounts of data arrive in a stream.
> > SAX and SAX-like libraries makes this easy to implement with XML. I hope
> > there's an equivalent for Json; if not there needs to be.

> Funny you mention that, I was just looking into that yesterday.

> This seems to be in the front running:
>   http://lloyd.github.com/yajl/

This looks promising. Thanks for the pointer.

				Ned

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email