IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Forum Suggestion from IETF SAA [RE: .org sale - bidding process]

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sun, 19 January 2020 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0222912006B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 07:03:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r9EaFewMaoXL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 07:03:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E49DC120044 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 07:03:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id l2so31179094lja.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 07:03:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XB2uW2tq2Xb6Bmgv5ZIzvyaMOIjNhfKDilJXFI1vhgM=; b=ST9m8S7q6RH/pz5lzTSxE2PFmjiIkX8qKiXohhWVS9lJONujtKZ9a06nqTYeUkegCS Xl4FPVGnCvhUK+sL1ZKMvLrBHkRxKfNsPgqy2zCQA54PxZmEzLML/tMXX4L2MiIs4q1F zhIY7jUpHRloY8daxLYqfCDAqX/igxWUSO6lYPfYP3ODvdvjROFCsBALJAPXn4DmiYNf VUnVmlPQT/qNbzktF/xE9aDyqPllWxGj3DwH0oPw5vK4UC3JrsizA7INPhjA0l0IfN+R bqWAD4dGnO3jdfEuif9/NIDCmb4Dzt85lZup6FVM1Nv2dKvtt/y49DnaUUs+yOnUaFVk kDJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XB2uW2tq2Xb6Bmgv5ZIzvyaMOIjNhfKDilJXFI1vhgM=; b=XWw6D/StYp1vGuznxWm/HWb3TAgrVSwW4/J8MSPaOlmTyc+7n1EJEUSCkBzkAB1hyT nxvMcqC+TNbH+UQyKvowQK4VD9Q3tbsVAUTblW0yd3D7SFZCnrDLW8BeRJHSeI1SBEca YErL9SXsVgpuo8akR0h97URkcUjBI5ek5StcWQeNYASx679b0nYr9BM4dLmm8CWVAJxd 0ES863g6Yn85Bn7zgEhbR92TjkzdGV+fi/ZbQEfOknlmGudZuf6iau0BIziR7crYoFyr fFSYnfJqubCNYkdNj7k+f3/vctNU3hxgum8nqUcnVau5kSKrUOu1QnQ+UzPxf5EmhFfi rcwQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVAMDQlj2qI56icyeP/SmoII3IHpQGD2X/2CS/0TQm8jNdRK3TY kwmiHbG2MhfY8vldTORTY+9fnP5KK2J/rHrOpBQQiHEC+wOLqQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxWArXn+7rsmYcs5ic11KvpttjjzNHPaOsyRYE//1Hcugg1q/B4dlcvSp8rYzXIVVfKBksqBHY+BCb43Bh6wRI=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9015:: with SMTP id h21mr11398432ljg.69.1579446233039; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 07:03:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SzL7NcnEQ7J7C+zxF28faHUzHOPQuhtuNCN6z9Z1M9Hvg@mail.gmail.com> <91b0323b-a2d3-a8e3-0bce-86a53c04fba2@ietf.org> <503dd3a8-8659-7525-3b43-f9c1c5b4e3ae@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <503dd3a8-8659-7525-3b43-f9c1c5b4e3ae@network-heretics.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 07:03:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPp6vMs8erME5QnND+gUh-sa2Qh6vcxqu9WJdG5j4t81Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Forum Suggestion from IETF SAA [RE: .org sale - bidding process]
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a9a3ae059c7f7b67"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dmh5wyfQsfdQtdM3hWVSYwvAyKc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 15:03:57 -0000

On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 6:35 AM Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
wrote:

> On 1/17/20 10:33 PM, Sergeant-at-Arms wrote:
>
> > And as per the IETF
> > discussion list charter [5], we suggest that the discussions should be
> > moved to the more specific forum identified.
>
> I don't think RFC 3005 was ever intended to be used as an excuse to move
> a discussion out of the IETF or to suppress discussion within IETF.
>

This seems like a surprising claim given that RFC 3005 explicitly lists as
inappropriate postings:

"Discussion of subjects unrelated to IETF policy, meetings, activities, or
technical concerns"

I'm not taking a position on whether this subject is "unrelated to IETF..."
but it seems pretty clear that RFC 3005 was in fact intended to allow for
discussion to be moved off of the *IETF list*

-Ekr


> Please reconsider.
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email