Re: IETF LLC & IETF Participation from USA-sanctioned countries

Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Sun, 07 March 2021 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0F43A1B32 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 11:15:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h10ArKEqKf7B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 11:15:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com (mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com [138.201.61.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D7D23A1B30 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 11:15:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xse472.mail2web.com ([66.113.197.218] helo=xse.mail2web.com) by mx135.antispamcloud.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1lIyrc-0018mN-A0 for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 20:14:55 +0100
Received: from xsmtp21.mail2web.com (unknown [10.100.68.60]) by xse.mail2web.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dtrkx21rBz1Br2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 11:14:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.5.2.14] (helo=xmail04.myhosting.com) by xsmtp21.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1lIyrZ-0001iI-4j for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 11:14:49 -0800
Received: (qmail 21406 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2021 19:14:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.104]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.58.43.2]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail04.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <ietf@ietf.org>; 7 Mar 2021 19:14:48 -0000
Subject: Re: IETF LLC & IETF Participation from USA-sanctioned countries
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <4619acc8-1ed4-52e8-849b-bfda9de61bb0@gont.com.ar> <20210303221433.ufsitioimata4dtg@crankycanuck.ca> <4739AA0B-95BA-48C8-A17D-730EAF547F55@gmail.com> <20210304155203.n5cfd3kmu2fpgdrt@crankycanuck.ca> <4FCD1F07-6DE9-402F-AFD3-A3C42F3D0ACF@cisco.com> <5a221b8f-73d8-037d-9b4f-f51a9c54e3bd@network-heretics.com> <20210304195744.jbgzpjlegbogmxu4@crankycanuck.ca> <dc91126f-59e8-e2f0-213c-e622b8ea0aa5@network-heretics.com> <25E6DFA6-C70D-4094-AC8C-19E0DBD46AEE@cisco.com> <54fd914c-a95c-2cef-658a-1bcd5e9e47a6@network-heretics.com> <eaf1cf64-83bb-88f4-5673-de73d5038ded@si6networks.com> <31743.1615133499@localhost> <7f457f48-197e-1c01-674e-1701a029e115@network-heretics.com>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Message-ID: <110df203-044b-aba9-00a3-e34a06162754@huitema.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 11:14:47 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7f457f48-197e-1c01-674e-1701a029e115@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------2551566A99E9F37B893C1C34"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: 66.113.197.218
X-Spampanel-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Username: 66.113.197.0/24
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=66.113.197.0/24@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.15)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: Pt3MvcO5N4iKaDQ5O6lkdGlMVN6RH8bjRMzItlySaT9WLQux0N3HQm8ltz8rnu+BPUtbdvnXkggZ 3YnVId/Y5jcf0yeVQAvfjHznO7+bT5x9j7219Tb9QoiGKb6esGsuKj/EwzSHE5FGYwwjsNRPCId3 cTqvJbgAgvLFGepVoiHmD6wdmZPcItWbGe10hXJtXL4FsauCVkDjmcYJdU3yWp7KuHNaaKdg7iBE ZefdsNUFWKwa/wzJUjmazeC7ImcaH/fhAnWH0920vSrPR7+0qhQ6V51u76v35b1wNe/MvdL/hXir I7jpLA3NtNK1rbkD2+J9PgaoF8SQHto3le4zsHTaeQtlKubP6iUTjj6yPARK6buALVaA782LKxg6 vRmng8N1aLhXqdc+jC1RcnVud53D5caUhbVtvqItBqoizkEt9O20UjkwI0v+LOlw05G4BS+iyyNq bT8dUMXMJ4tUCMj6G37ZfAMLceP5aNHPt26RBupu5v1nytoNnc138GfEJRQ2qC7jjynPIHPNqSn4 QTXUjLjYWQt1/5xnQymMoPsgr/U0flMcy2Vi/IcBgY4arPaiJ1W6hAyiRC61jekdwIcXNugoOEbH RyFULpSjm7jZ1h/HfDRQ5Ig8VhPsPE8NlkBmbR1LS6Kx8w5MHqDEEwjKMksbXwSoBrVpxniYtnT0 5owDl9cz0DTkAib7rKXdDRojSVizNl0ce/s7u0P9b7Oijoc3SCZfWp1RjkjWCw/vIUzTXkDAiiJi mGhLUFuS2lhaIetXfCg1JdAVrOwKfNRJPlb42TyT/1tLNn2XbhtUoFIvD3sIcP1fhJPM6B/8iBGL RIof51KCLjlyMeRPZPWGXoutrOtTv2zEEwpkrPmJ+dym1L8cD17Js0v4cp1Mi6HOb21Dt4abMGm/ wKV3kzcKVNeVJ9BXyu9+ceCqThTYg2px1fSoqxQCCHnLMo/m9VKh99btUAanjnMCAH2co+fBoeG+ Hs0afhsY/5zhNYWRVYKU9W9tbmVXJBqdHHDmZEKhyNAv1N35kYWaEdgLurFV5oTvAcwA4rM3FkfW 8/1kE/e7sUnsVpINvARNxpFO
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine11.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dnwFI93pvXUjJbF_LfvTimbqTQs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 19:15:06 -0000

On 3/7/2021 9:22 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
> On 3/7/21 11:11 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>>      > * Are participants from sanctioned countries or organizations 
>> allowed
>>      > to participate in mailing-list discussions, and e.g. publish
>>      > Internet-Drafts, or RFCs?
>>
>> I suspect that we won't like the answer, so maybe we shouldn't ask the
>> question :-)
>
> No, we need to know, even if we won't like the answer, and even if we 
> can't change the situation.    Far too much prejudice is perpetuated 
> by those kinds of taboos.


This is not exactly an issue of prejudice. AFAIK, we do not have checks 
to verify that some new subscriber to an IETF working group is not 
accessing the server from a penalized country through a VPN, or any such 
workaround. We don't really want to set up any check like that, because 
they are intrusive and complicated, and also because they are beyond 
commonly held standards. Yet, if we conducted an in depth study of the 
issue, who knows whether some bureaucrat somewhere would force the IETF 
to enforce such checks, or force the LLC to spend a good chunk of money 
asserting our rights to not do that. It is probably much wiser to let 
sleeping dogs lie.

-- Christian Huitema